Category: News

  • Insider’s View: Reflections on the Training 2016 Conference

    By Stephanie Hemmert

    This past February, I had the privilege of attending and teaching at the Training 2016 Conference, which was held in Orlando, Florida by the Training Magazine Network. This was the first time I had attended this conference. This article includes some of my reflections on the meeting.

    Training Magazine Network sent out a call for presenters in spring 2015, which caught my eye. I had seen a similar call a few years prior and had intended to submit something, but ended up being outrun by time. This go around I decided to try for it. I had a class in mind (“Identifying and Reducing Decision Making Biases”) that I’ve taught around the country to mostly court staff and some judges for a number of years now and felt the content and design were well honed. The submission deadline was mid-June. Much to my delight, at the end of July I received an invitation to teach my session at what they called a “hands on clinic.” By being a presenter, Training Magazine then waived the registration fee for me to attend the three-day conference. I was psyched, and after clearing it with my agency, I was ready to go!

    The conference structure I found rather typical. It offered preconference certification programs, there were plenary keynote speakers, well over a hundred breakout sessions, “future forums,” dinner roundtables, “town halls,” and a large expo. Participants hailed from over 1,000 different organizations. I suspect most were from private companies, though there were non-profit and government entities represented as well.

    Something I had never seen before at an educational conference is that they had a live band in the plenary room that played right before and after the keynote sessions. They played very well, but they were loud. LOUD! So very loud it was difficult to hear the person sitting next to me speak. (I must be getting old!) So what they gained in getting the participants’ energies psyched up, they may have lost in participants individually connecting with each other. Nevertheless, the music was rockin’!

    The keynote sessions were neuroscientist and engineer Greg Gage of Backyard Brains; “The Gentleman Thief” Apollo Robbins; Jay Shuster, Production Designer at Pixar on “Behind the Scenes at Pixar”; and Welby Altidor, Executive Creative Director at Cirque du Soleil on “Creative Courage.” They each spoke for 45 minutes and I thought it was interesting that the conference billed two on each day, right after one another with a very quick break in between. (Greg Gage and Apollo Robbins back to back and then Jay Shuster and Welby Altidor back to back.) One of the biggest nuggets I enjoyed from the keynotes was Jay talking about “failing forward” and how learning happens in so called mistakes. Good stuff!

    It was a challenge to pick breakout sessions to attend! They were mostly only offered once and the conference had about 15 sessions running concurrently. Talk about pressure! It was exciting, though, to have such an array of choices. The sessions I chose included “Experiential Micro Learning: Aligning Content across Multiple Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy;” “Competencies, and Competency Modeling Done Right;” “Aspire to be a Positive Deviant;” and “Using Brain Science to Improve Learning Design.” I particularly gained a lot from the Brain Science/Learning Design session, which was led by Art Kohn, a cognitive neuroscientist who focused on specific ways to present information that maximize learning and memory. I loved Art’s emphasis on the trainer’s responsibility for providing context to learners and for providing boosts afterwards to cement the learning and encourage behavior change.

    If you are curious about the sessions, materials from the conference are posted here. I encourage you to poke around! If you are curious about the conference in general, I encourage you to read reactions and posts from the conference through the Twitter feed.

    As for my session, it was so much fun leading it! I had a small group of 18 participants. I am proud to say each one was engaged. We had a great dialogue and the participants embraced the interactivity. I think I gained almost 18 new “LinkedIn” friends, too.

    The 2017 conference will be January 30 through February 1 in San Diego. If you are thinking you would love to attend and possibly teach, I recommend registering on the Training Magazine Network website, to become a member and sign up for their email notifications. If you submit a proposal, let me know how it goes! You will also find out about the vast number of free, periodic webinars they offer through regular email messages. If you can’t attend a webinar live, they often give you the option of viewing the archive at a later time.

    Stephanie HemmertStephanie Hemmert, a Senior Judicial Education Attorney, works with the Federal Judicial Center, a judicial branch agency whose primary mission is education and research for the federal courts. Prior to law school, Stephanie worked in the insurance industry in underwriting and training capacities. All views expressed are her own.

  • From the President (Spring 2016)

    By Margaret Allen

    Margaret Allen
    NASJE President Margaret Allen

    Colleagues, I hope this message finds you very well. In this edition of “From the President”, I’ll share an overview of the many activities undertaken by our association since January.

    Board Activities

    Midyear Meeting. The NASJE Board of Directors met in Austin, Texas on January 25-26 and were graciously hosted by NASJE member Mark Atkinson and his staff at the Texas Center for the Judiciary.

    Topics of discussion included:

    • Consideration of the Strategic Planning Document and identification of ways to achieve short-term goals related to increasing membership, raising NASJE’s profile and enhancing benefits of NASJE membership
    • Examination of the Curriculum Use Plan and discussion of methods to make it an even more accessible resource for members and others. Click here to view the Curriculum Use Plan easy reference guide distributed at the October 2015 NASJE Annual Conference.
    • Review of NASJE’s budget and investments. Thanks to the meticulous work of Treasurer Jeff Schrade and Merry Hofford before him, NASJE is in excellent shape financially.
    • In addition to conducting Board business, we also had the pleasure of seeing several NASJE members and partners in Austin:
      • Hope Lochridge, Executive Director, and Ryan Turner, General Counsel and Director of Education, both of the Texas Municipal Courts Education Center.
      • Dottie McDonald from Smart Start, Inc.
      • Scott Griffith, President-Elect of the National Association for Court Management (NACM) and Director of Research and Court Services, and David Slayton, NACM Past President and Texas State Court Administrator, joined us for lunch. Mr. Slayton was kind enough to give us a tour of the Texas Capital and the Administrative Office of the Courts, including both courts of last resort in Texas. See the Facebook page soon for photos from the tour.

    Virtual Meetings for State Directors and Past Presidents. Look for an email soon to schedule virtual meetings for each of these groups. Time has been allotted on Sunday, September 25 for sessions at the annual conference as well.

    NASJE Goes Behind the Camera. The Board of Directors is leading an initiative to create videos for prospective members and new members and invites your photographs or videos of courses, your office space or of you and your colleagues. Also invited are short videos and/or audio clips about the work of judicial branch educators and what it means to us, as well as the benefits you enjoy as a NASJE member. Please send submissions to margaret.allen@sc.ohio.gov with the subject line “NASJE Video Project”.

    Committee Corner: NASJE committees are active year-round, and it is never too late to join. Click here to see a list of committees with contact information for committee chairs, and click here to see a calendar of committee meetings.

    Save the Dates! NASJE has many learning opportunities in the works for 2016. Check the calendar for more details. Emails will be sent to members from nasje@ncsc.org with links and phone numbers to join each event.

    • Look for webinars planned by NASJE’s regional directors in May, June, and August, and “Articlub” (think of a book club format, but discussing an article) conference calls in April and July. Dates and times TBA, but most will fall during the fourth week of the month. These webinars are just one of the valuable benefits of NASJE membership.
    • September 25-28: NASJE Annual Conference, Burlington, Vermont. “Changing Perspectives in Judicial Branch Education: Re-Engage, Rethink, Renew”. More information and registration materials will be available by May.
      • Have a colleague who develops education at the local level? Let them know how much you benefit from being a NASJE member!

    NASJE Partners. I greatly enjoyed the opportunity to meet chief justices from around the country at the Conference of Chief Justices (CCJ) Midyear Meeting in early February. Pictured below are NASJE Past President John Meeks (Vice President, ICM), NASJE President Margaret Allen, and CCJ President Chief Justice Gilbertson at the conference.

    CCJ

    Education topics included same-sex marriage, an update on the Civil Justice Initiative and a session on the 2015 book, Reimagining Courts: A Design for the 21st Century.

    Our colleagues at the National Association for Court Management (NACM) highlighted a new resource at their February Midyear Conference – the curriculum designs based on the NACM Core, the thirteen competency areas identified in the refresh of the NACM Core Competencies created in the 1990s. In the planning stages is a joint webinar with NACM to introduce the resource to NASJE and NACM members (target month is May 2016).

    The NACM Midyear Conference theme, “Extending Out from the Core: The Profession in Practice” provided a canvas on which to present practical sessions on topics such as procedural justice, the role of perceptions in communication, employee engagement, pretrial justice reform and others. Click here to view conference materials. For videos of selected sessions, click here.

    CCJ President Chief Justice Gilbertson (SD) opened the CCJ Midyear Meeting with the observation that “none of our jobs are getting easier, and for that reason education is essential”. I couldn’t agree more, and on behalf of the NASJE Board of Directors, I thank you for your efforts to advance the administration of justice through excellence in judicial branch education.

    Contact me or any member of the Board with questions, ideas or comments about how your NASJE membership can be a greater professional benefit for you. We look forward to connecting with you at an upcoming NASJE webinar, a committee meeting, on the Judicial Educators Facebook page, our LinkedIn group, the list serve, or by email or telephone.

    All the best to you, and I wish you a wonderful spring!

    Margaret R. Allen, President, NASJE
    614.387.9464
    margaret.allen@sc.ohio.gov

  • Procedural Fairness for Court Staff

    By Hon. Mark Goodner, Deputy Counsel and Director of Judicial Education, Texas Municipal Courts Education Center

    Kelly Tait WebinarOn February 25, 2016, NASJE’s Northeastern Region sponsored a webinar for NASJE members entitled Procedural Fairness for Court Staff: A Brief Curriculum for Teaching, facilitated by Kelly Tait, Immediate Past President of NASJE, and Joan Bishop, NASJE Northeastern Region Director. About 55 people participated in the webinar. It was a very quick-moving and informative exploration of how and why judicial branch educators should include the topic of procedural fairness in education programs for court personnel as well as judges.

    Kelly Tait spent time up front talking about the importance of getting buy-in from court personnel when approaching the topic in an educational setting, and she offered several examples of ways that could be done. For instance, a string of video clips related to poor customer service showed how frustrating (if not infuriating) it can be when customers are not served fairly and effectively. The video clips helped to put us in the shoes of a court user who might be angered by a perceived lack of fairness. Drawing examples from the learners and using analogies such as the alienating and intimidating use of specialized medical language by health care professionals are also effective methods of letting learners know why procedural fairness is important.

    The facilitators explained procedural fairness as whether or not people experiencing the justice system perceive the procedures used and the interpersonal treatment they received as fair. The aspect of “perception” in this brought to mind judicial ethics, as all court personnel must avoid impropriety as well as the perception of impropriety in the courts. Likewise, we can’t disregard the perception of the court user when evaluating procedural fairness. The four key components of procedural fairness are (1) Understanding (Is there an understanding of court and the process?); (2) Voice (Are court users being heard?); (3) Respect (Do court users feel they’ve been treated with respect and dignity?); and (4) Neutrality (Is the court providing a neutral forum?). Helpfulness was also discussed as a related aspect that is relevant to court personnel. This explanation provided a very well-rounded picture of what judicial branch educators should be concerned with when considering procedural fairness.

    Procedural fairness should be exhibited (and embraced) by all members of the court staff. Court staff have more contact with court users and experience a one-on-one exchange of information. If the court and the court staff have dealt with users fairly, then those users are more likely to cooperate, be pleasant, provide information, accept decisions, comply with orders, and leave with a positive perception of the court system.

    Joan Bishop discussed some of the barriers to court staff providing procedural fairness. These include personal biases and stereotypes as well as a lack of time due to a high volume of cases and people they are working with. These barriers led to some valuable discussion with webinar attendees, spurred on by questions developed by Northeastern Region members. All participants agreed that including this topic in court educational programs is vital, and participants discussed the different models, group sizes, and methods that might be most useful in talking this topic. Facilitators provided several resources including an excerpt of a toolkit for measuring perceptions of fairness by Emily Gold LaGratta of the Center for Court Innovation and a list of relevant websites and publications.

    This was a useful webinar on an important topic, and NASJE thanks the Northeastern Region for sponsoring it.

    A recording of the webinar, a PDF with resources, and a PDF of the content from the PowerPoint show are available in the Member Area of this website (Resources > Member Area. If you are a NASJE member and need the password, please contact Kelly Tait at ktconsulting@aol.com or Nancy Smith at nfsmith@sc.pima.gov).

  • NASJE Member Kudos

    Diane Cowdrey
    Diane Cowdrey

    Several NASJE members published articles in Judicial Education and Training: Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training, Issue 4 (2015). Congratulations to all of them for their fine work in Judicial Branch Education.

    Dr. Diane E. Cowdrey, Director of California’s Center for Judiciary Education and Research, authored “Teaching New Judges what it Means to “Be” a Judge.”

    Joseph Sawyer
    Joseph Sawyer

    William J. Brunson and Joseph R. Sawyer of the National Judicial College wrote “The National Judicial College Approach to Distance Learning: Towards a Model of Best Practice.”

    Dr. Livingston Armytage, Director for the Centre of Judicial Studies in Sydney, Australia wrote the introduction to Issue 4, as well as “Bench Books: Key Publishing Guidelines.”

    You can find a link to the publication at https://nasje.org/iojt-judicial-education-and-training/

  • NJC Releases Preliminary Data on Criminal Justice Training Survey

    By Katheryn Yetter, NASJE Futures Committee

    The NASJE Futures Committee identifies trends and makes forecasts of emerging issues, knowledge, and information that has the potential to significantly impact NAJSE and the practice of judicial branch education. Moreover, we are charged with reporting on these trends and forecasts to the NASJE membership.

    The National Judicial College (NJC), with funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, is in the process of developing an advanced curriculum on criminal justice topics for judges in 2017. As part of the curriculum development process, NJC surveyed state judicial educators, state court administrators, and other stakeholders to identify specific needs around judicial education in the criminal justice arena and how the developed curriculum might meet those needs. With this in mind, the Futures Committee shares the following information with NASJE in support of its objectives, and as a “thank you” to those NASJE members who participated in the survey.

    The survey was completed in January 2016. One of the questions asked was whether adequate judicial education existed on criminal law and criminal justice topics. Even though the majority replied that mandatory education existed on these topics (67%) in their state, respondents were evenly split on whether what existed was adequate. Some of the content mentioned as needing some skill-building for judges were evidence-based sentencing, digital and forensic evidence, expert witnesses, and pretrial justice matters.

    Additionally, while most states had at least an introductory or basic course to offer judges on criminal law or criminal justice topics (65%), only about half offered programming with more advanced topics. Those topics that were noted as among the most pressing for judges today were:

    Topics Survey

    Of note, “evidence” most often included forensic, digital, and scientific evidence.

    The NJC will also survey a limited number of its judicial alumni to further explore topics of interest to them as part of the curriculum development process. For more information about the curriculum or the needs assessment, please contact Program Attorney Irene Hart at ihart@judges.org.

  • Curriculum and Education Committee to Host “Article Club” Sessions

    The Curriculum and Education Committee will host two “book club” style telephone conferences this year in an effort to bring NASJE members together in conversations about topics of interest. The first session is scheduled for Thursday, April 28, 2016, from 1:00pm to 2:30pm CDT.

    What’s an “Article Club,” you ask? Think book club, but the selection is an article, requiring less time to read and discuss. Committee member Stephanie Hemmert shared that the inspiration for these sessions came from a desire to provide “a convenient and fun way for members to dialogue over ideas, new and classic; connect with one another; and inspire learning.”

    The first article chosen by the committee is “Do You Suffer from Decision Fatigue?” by John Tierney. This 2011 New York Times article provides a review of the research included in an excellent book, Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength, by John Tierney and Roy F. Baumeister.

    As Judith Anderson, co-chair of the committee, observes, the session “will be like your regular book club, but without the chairs, couches, or good food.”

    These sessions will be held in a conference call format, and the focus will be on discussion. The discussion will be moderated by members of the committee.

    “While we come together for committee meetings and see each other at conferences, we don’t have many opportunities to talk with, and learn from, each other,” says committee co-chair, Dr. Anthony Simones of Missouri. “The sessions we are proposing are designed to address this.”

    To register and receive the conference call access code information, please contact Anthony.Simones@courts.mo.gov.

    Also, save the date! The second “Article Club” will be on Thursday, July 14, 2016.

  • On the Fast-Track: Nebraska’s Judicial Branch Education Training Center is a Creative Model for Success

    By Christal Keegan, Esq. (NV)

    Nebraska Training FacilityIn 2004, judicial education became mandatory for Nebraska judges, probation and Court staff. In 2005, judicial branch education staff were hired, and in 2006 the program was designed and launched. The funding for the mandatory judicial education program came from “dollar filing fees” meaning a dollar from every filing fee received was directed towards the program. The fund receives approximately $374,000 per year which has not been a tremendous budget for growing a program.

    The program started with a director, Carole McMahon-Boies, and one clerical staff. Carole’s biggest challenge was to grow the program on her given budget. Because of Carole’s restricted budget, her main education delivery method for Court staff became distance learning. Carole realized she needed more funding to grow and so she reached out to another part of the judicial branch that was untapped – the probation division. Strategically, she knew the probation division received funding from the general appropriation fund. Probation had just begun an ambitious project to implement evidence based practices, and training initiatives blossomed. Once Carole established a firm partnership with probation, far more funding was available. In addition to partnering with probation Carole undertook a new program in Nebraska – Attorney CLE – which became mandatory in 2009. This provided the opportunity to share some resources between programs.

    The new Judicial Branch Education Training Center opened in October of 2015 in Lincoln, Nebraska, less than 10 years since Carole took the helm. In its humble roots, the offices for the program were housed in a historic setting, the Supreme Court law library “because nobody uses a law library any more” Carole said. The trainings were conducted in a hotel training space. But because of her fruitful efforts to grow the program, they soon outgrew the space. Now, all the training is housed in the Judicial Branch Education Training Center, including the training done by the Court Improvement Program which provides education regarding juvenile issues.

    NE Training FacilityWhile Carole misses her old historic office setting, she’s enthusiastic about her new modern home equipped with state of the art technology. The training center has four training rooms, all equipped with 90” screen video TVs that are networked but can also operate autonomously, there is a retractable curtain to partition the rooms for quick accommodation, and significant acoustics attributed to the top-notch speaker system.

    Another highlight Carole identified in the new training center was the kitchen. Having the kitchen is an upgrade that makes it convenient for all of the probation officers that gather regularly from across the state for new officer training. The officers practically live at the facility for a nine week training in Lincoln. There have been several new probation initiatives implemented by the Nebraska legislature. To give you an idea of the size of the undertaking, there are approximately 220 new probation officers hired in the last 18 months, all of which have gone through new probation officer training through judicial branch education. Other highlights of the building include its live two-way video conferencing capabilities offered state-wide. The building also offers many conveniences to the attending judges which include parking right outside of the facilities (which they didn’t have at their old location) and they have partnered with a hotel right behind the facility so it’s an easy walk across the street to class for those that live in more remote regions of the state.

    To give you a sense of the driving force that is Carole, there are a total of 1800 judges and court staff in Nebraska, 109 judges in her state. Those are modest numbers compared to other states. But through her campaign she was able to grow from a staff that included just her as director and one clerical staff to her current fully staffed state which includes a probation education director, a court staff director, four trainers (which includes ex-probation officers and attorneys to do the court staff training), a distance learning specialist, and two clerical staff. Not to mention her instrumental role in delivering a state of the art training center for her judges.

    Through this entire process, Carole learned that she needs to find partners to accomplish her goals. No [wo]man is an island and she relied on outside resources. She said “it’s amazing what’s out there and that doesn’t cost anything.” Her advice to her colleagues is “get creative, it’s amazing what you can achieve.”

    Carole McMahon-BoiesAbout Carole McMahon-Boies
    In May of 2014, the Nebraska Supreme Court named Carole McMahon-Boies as Administrator for Judicial Branch Education and the Attorney Services Division of the Nebraska Judicial Branch. As administrator for Attorney Services, Carole provides support to the Counsel for Discipline, Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Commission, Nebraska State Bar Commission, and the Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Additionally, she retained her position as education director for the Judicial Branch providing educational offerings for all judicial branch employees and judges. She has served as Director of Judicial Branch Education since October 2006. Prior to her position with the Court, Carole practiced law for 25 years mainly in the area of labor litigation. Several of her cases were the subject of published opinions in the Federal Circuit Courts and the Nebraska Supreme Court. She is a member of the bar in both Nebraska and Iowa and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court. She is a past president of the Robert Van Pelt American Inns of Court. Her teaching experience includes adjunct faculty for many years with Nebraska Wesleyan, Doane College, Union College, and Hamilton College where she taught Labor Law, Human Resource Management, Criminal Law, Contracts, and Business Law.

  • VIDEO: Larry Stone receives Karen Thorson Award

    Larry Stone is the embodiment of the qualities the Karen Thorson Award recognizes: a deep, abiding positive influence on our organization and our profession. The award was presented to him at NASJE’s 2015 Annual Conference in Seattle (October 4-7).

    Below is two-minute video clip of Karen Thorson introducing Larry, the recipient of the award, followed by a portion of Larry’s acceptance speech. The full video of the award ceremony can be viewed here.

  • Missouri NASJE Member Earns Award for Judicial Civics

    Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Missouri, Patricia Breckenridge, presented NASJE member, Anthony Simones, with the Missouri Chief Justice’s Award for Judicial Civics on October 8, 2015 at the annual Missouri Judicial Conference. The award recognizes excellence and leadership in promoting education about the courts.

    Dr. Simones is the Manager of Judicial Education for the state of Missouri and has been a member of NASJE since taking the position four years ago.

    Anthony Simones award
    Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Missouri, Patricia Breckenridge, presented NASJE member, Anthony Simones, with the Missouri Chief Justice’s Award for Judicial Civics

    Commenting on his impact, Chief Justice Breckenridge stated: “When Dr. Simones joined the Office of State Courts Administrator he had been a professor at Dalton State College and was a nominee for both the Georgia Professor of the Year and the Carnegie Foundation U.S. Professor of the Year. Georgia’s loss is our gain. In just four short years, he has brought his enthusiasm to virtually every aspect of judicial education.”

    Noting the specific initiatives of which he has been a part, Breckenridge observed: “Dr. Simones is a true ambassador for the judiciary. His development of the Court Management Institute and Judicial Leadership Conference reflects his genuine passion for the judicial system.”

    “Tony also has the unique ability to engage any audience in learning,” Breckenridge noted. “An integral member of the Civic Education Review subcommittee, his creativity is evident in every presentation developed for use by members of the judiciary and educators.”

    “Dr. Simones has been the heart and soul of the civic education effort and I am pleased to recognize his contribution today,” Breckenridge concluded.

    “To be recognized in this manner is an extraordinary honor,” Dr. Simones said in response to the award. “But to receive it from Chief Justice Breckenridge, someone for whom I have such respect and admiration, someone who was the driving force behind the civic education initiative in this state, makes it especially meaningful.”

  • IOJT Publishes 4th Issue of Judicial Education and Training

    Judicial Education and TrainingThe International Organization for Judicial Training (IOJT) recently announced the publication of the fourth issue of Judicial Education and Training.

    This issue presents twelve articles, which primarily addresses four themes:

    • Remote delivery of judicial education
    • Diversity in South Asian approaches
    • Core aspects of pedagogy
    • The Europe experience

    The authors are:

    • William Brunson and Joseph Sawyer of the National Judicial College, USA
    • Dr Livingston Armytage, Director for the Centre for Judicial Studies, Sydney
    • Chief Judge Thomas Crabtree, Justice Joseph W. Bovard and Ms. Magdalena Serwin of the National Judicial Institute of Canada
    • Judge Boon Heng Tan, Executive Director of the Judicial College of Singapore
    • Dr. Faqir Hussain, then Director General of Pakistan’s Federal Judicial Academy
    • Shreekrishna Mulmi, Deputy Director at National Judicial Academy of Nepal
    • Dr. Charles A. Ericksen and Judge Lavdim Krasniqi Director of the Kosovo Judicial Institute
    • Dr Cheselden George Carmona, of the Philippine Judicial Academy
    • Dr Diane Cowdrey, Director of California’s Center for Judiciary Education and Research
    • Professor Brettel Dawson, Director of Education, National Judicial Institute of Canada
    • Judge Dr Petros Alikakos of Greece, who is member of the Consultative Board of the Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals, Council of Europe
    • Professor Piotr Mikuli of Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

    All four issues of the IOJT Journal are available at the IOJT website.