Category: News

  • The MacArthur Foundation’s Safety + Justice Challenge

    Safety + Justice ChallengeThe MacArthur Foundation just released its newest criminal justice initiative for jurisdictions to apply for grants to improve justice systems—especially as it relates to jail populations. This is an extremely important initiative as MacArthur plans to invest $75 million over multiple years to help make improvements.

    Up to 20 jurisdictions will receive grants of $150,000 and consulting help during a six-month collaborative planning period. In 2016, as many as 10 of those jurisdictions will be selected for a second round of funding—between $500,000 and $2 million annually—to support implementation of their plans over two years.

    Visit the Safety + Justice Challenge website, where you’ll find the RFP and more information. Applications are due by March 31, 2015.

  • The NACM Core is Live!

    The National Association for Court Management is pleased to announce the final update of its core competencies – The Core. Through the support of the State Justice Institute (SJI), the Core is now available at nacmcore.org.

    The Core tag line, Strengthening Court Professionals, defines NACM’s goal in updating its core competencies. NACM’s approach provides a roadmap to the profession—from the foundational knowledge of the enduring principles that every individual working in the court system should possess to the more complex and advanced areas required to be an effective court professional.

    As such, the Core is organized into three modules: Principles, Practice, and Vision. Within each are competencies that describe what court professionals need to know within the diverse field of court administration while promoting excellence in the administration of justice:

    Principles:
    – Purposes and Responsibilities of the Court
    – Public Trust and Confidence

    Practice:
    – Caseflow and Workflow
    – Operations Management
    – Public Relations
    – Educational Development
    – Workforce Management
    – Ethics
    – Budget and Fiscal Management
    – Accountability and Court Performance

    Vision:
    – Leadership
    – Strategic Planning
    – Court Governance

    The next phase of the project includes the development of curriculum for each of the thirteen (13) competencies. The Justice Management Institute (JMI) will act as the project manager for this effort and the membership will be asked to participate again through a questionnaire regarding their educational needs. The curriculum, as well as a new NACM Guide detailing practical use of the Core, will be available to the membership by the 2015 annual conference.

  • Conducting Effective Training through Careful Evaluation

    by Theresa L. Bohannan, MPH

    Disclaimer: The following is an excerpt and adaption from A Guide to Conducting Effective Training Evaluations: Recommendations, Strategies and Tools for Dependency Court Improvement Programs (Guide), authored by Dr. Sophia Gatowski and Dr. Shirley Dobbin.

    A Guide to Conducting Effective Training Evaluations: Recommendations, Strategies and Tools for Dependency Court Improvement ProgramsProfessionals who want to increase their knowledge about specialty topics in their field typically attend conferences, continuing education programs, or other forms of training. Professional development can take resources away from daily activities so it is critical that we know we are spending our time wisely and that trainings are effective. Trainees fill out surveys, either online or in-person, asking what they thought of the food, the venue, the materials, the speaker, etc. However, is that training increasing trainees’ knowledge about a subject matter? Is the training effective at changing attitudes and behaviors? The way to get to these answers is by conducting effective training evaluation. Conducting effective training evaluation is imperative to ensuring people are receiving the intended benefits of the training event.

    State Court Improvement Program (CIP) coordinators tasked with judicial trainings related to child abuse and neglect issues may find evaluation a difficult step in planning. The stress on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in recent years has illuminated the need to improve and tailor training. A component of this is careful evaluation before, during, and after training events.

    The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ), as part of the National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues, a service of the Children’s Bureau, developed A Guide to Conducting Effective Training Evaluations: Recommendations, Strategies and Tools for Dependency Court Improvement Programs. The Guide assists in identifying training needs, developing training methodologies and evaluation tools, and assessing training outcomes. The Guide does not recommend a universal method to evaluation, but rather provides the tools and resources needed for training coordinators to adopt their own evaluation method. It offers approaches for measuring objectives and outcomes. The Guide seeks to help training managers better target, design, and deliver trainings.

    Development of the Guide first started with a comprehensive review of effective strategies for adult education and training programs. We evaluated resource materials and interviewed judicial educators. We examined options for training design, mode of delivery, and obtained perspectives on training evaluation generally and specifically for dependency court systems. An advisory committee made content recommendations and several state CIPs piloted the strategies, guidance, and template evaluation tools. Feedback and lessons learned from these pilot sites enhanced the final product.

    The main goals of the Guide are to:

    1. Provide guidance and strategies for the program planning, design, implementation, and evaluation stages of dependency court training efforts;
    2. Encourage training coordinators to use the strategies to support local, state, and national training agendas; and
    3. Provide template tools that facilitate an assessment of satisfaction, skill or knowledge acquisition, behavior, practice and attitude change, and training impacts or outcomes.

    The Guide consists of six chapters that lead training program managers through the entire evaluation process.

    Chapter One, “Training Program Planning and Evaluation”, focuses on the critical program planning tasks and training evaluation basics. In order to tailor training, a first step is to conduct a training needs assessment to discover gaps in professional development. Training needs assessments will help inform future training planning and ensure professionals in the field are receiving up-to-date information that is relevant to their daily work. Having a comprehensive resource available to training coordinators can greatly improve their planning and eventually improve outcomes for trainees.

    Chapter Two, “Training Satisfaction and Reaction Measurement”, provides recommendations and strategies for ensuring that the measurement of training participants is useful.

    Chapter Three, “Measuring Learning Acquisition”, centers on measuring learning acquisition by explaining the primary learning modes that occur during training and providing methods for evaluating learning.

    Chapter Four, “The Assessment of Behavior and Practice Change”, focuses on measuring behavior and practice change and provides guidance of how to assess whether trainees applied their newly acquired skills.

    Chapter Five, “The Assessment of Training Outcomes”, reviews approaches to determining the outcomes associated with training programs.

    Chapter Six, “Analyzing, Interpreting, and Reporting Training Evaluation Data”, provides ideas for analyzing, reporting and utilizing training evaluation data and covers the analytical techniques needed to understand results.

    Associated with each chapter are Tools and Resources that facilitate development of unique evaluation and assessment tools.

    This comprehensible resource will assist State CIPs and other training professionals assigned to designing effective dependency court training across the nation. Methods introduced in the Guide will allow training coordinators to go beyond reporting the number of training programs held and participants trained. It will help assess the impacts and outcomes from training events. The Guide is available on the NCJFCJ website, along with a navigation tool to assist users in determining their understanding of training evaluation and where to begin.

  • Pat Murrell Receives 2014 Karen Thorson Award

    The NASJE Business meeting was held during lunch on Tuesday, August 5, and President Jill Goski presided over the business meeting and presented Dr. Patricia H. Murrell with the Karen Thorson Award.

    Dr. Patricia Murrell leads NASJE Conference attendees in an experiential learning activity.
    Dr. Patricia Murrell leads NASJE Conference attendees in an experiential learning activity.
    Dr. Patricia H. Murrell receives the Karen Thorson Award.
    Dr. Patricia H. Murrell receives the Karen Thorson Award.
    NASJE President Jill Goski presents the Karen Thorson Award to Dr. Patricia H. Murrell.
    NASJE President Jill Goski presents the Karen Thorson Award to Dr. Patricia H. Murrell.

     

  • Updates from the 2014 NASJE Annual Conference

    The 2014 NASJE Annual Conference is underway. Check here for pictures and updates from the conference.

     

    Wednesday, August 6

    The 2014 NASJE Annual Conference is wrapping up with a plenary session by Toni Halleen, JD, in which attendees are exploring how lessons from improve comedy can help them be more effective under pressure.

    Toni Halleen, JD, presenting the Wednesday, August 6 Plenary Session: Think on the Spot: Effectiveness Under Pressure.
    Toni Halleen, JD, presenting the Wednesday, August 6 Plenary Session:
    Think on the Spot: Effectiveness Under Pressure.
    Toni Halleen, JD, presenting the Wednesday, August 6 Plenary Session: Think on the Spot: Effectiveness Under Pressure.
    Toni Halleen, JD, presenting the Wednesday, August 6 Plenary Session:
    Think on the Spot: Effectiveness Under Pressure.

     

    Tuesday, August 5

    Dr. William F. Meinecke, Jr. presents the Tuesday, August 5 afternoon plenary session:
    Dr. William F. Meinecke, Jr. presents the Tuesday, August 5 afternoon plenary session:
    Law, Justice & Holocaust: How the Courts Failed Germany

    The NASJE Business meeting was held during lunch on Tuesday, August 5. President Jill Goski presided over the business meeting and presented Dr. Patricia H. Murrell with the Karen Thorson Award. Attendees heard reports from the Chairs of NASJE committees, approved proposed changes to NASJE Constitution and Bylaws, and elected members to open NASJE Board seats.

    Dr. Patricia Murrell leads NASJE Conference attendees in an experiential learning activity.
    Dr. Patricia Murrell leads NASJE Conference attendees in an experiential learning activity.
    Dr. Patricia H. Murrell receives the Karen Thorson Award.
    Dr. Patricia H. Murrell receives the Karen Thorson Award.
    NASJE President Jill Goski presents the Karen Thorson Award to Dr. Patricia H. Murrell.
    NASJE President Jill Goski presents the Karen Thorson Award to Dr. Patricia H. Murrell.

     

    10:50 AM
    Dr. Maureen Conner just completed her portion of the morning plenary. During the session, Dr. Conner led participants to think about and discuss their own professional guiding philosophy, mission, values, voice, thinking, acting, competence, and ability to be forward-looking, as well as how these factors impact each participant’s organization and the profession of judicial education as a whole. Participants were divided into groups, and each group reported back on one of the above listed factors. The thoughts that the different groups shared will be collected and presented in a future article for the NASJE News.

    Dr. Maureen E. Conner presents the Tuesday morning plenary session: "Judicial Educators as Change Leaders"
    Dr. Maureen E. Conner presents the Tuesday morning plenary session: “Judicial Educators as Change Leaders”
    Conference attendees chatting prior to the Tuesday morning plenary session.
    Conference attendees chatting prior to the Tuesday morning plenary session.

     

     

    Monday, August 4

    Boarding the trolley back to the hotel after the NASJE reception at Riva Restaurant on Navy Pier.
    Boarding the trolley back to the hotel after the NASJE reception at Riva Restaurant on Navy Pier.
    Deborah Smith from the National Center for State Courts presents during the "What's Trending and the Vital Role of Judicial Branch Education" session.
    Deborah Smith from the National Center for State Courts presents during the “What’s Trending and the Vital Role of Judicial Branch Education” session.
    NASJE Attendees discuss the film Fruitvale Station in an afternoon session.
    NASJE Attendees discuss the film Fruitvale Station in an afternoon session.
    Monday, August 4: Professor Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Cornell Law School, delivers the Plenary Address -- Implicit Bias and the Myth of Equal Justice
    Monday, August 4: Professor Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Cornell Law School, delivers the Plenary Address: “Implicit Bias and the Myth of Equal Justice”
    Monday, August 4: Conference attendees talking during the morning break.
    Monday, August 4: Conference attendees talking during the morning break.
    Hon. Dennis Archer, former Mayor of Detroit and former Michigan Supreme Court Justice, delivers the Keynote Address: "Perceptions of Justice & Judicial Education"
    Monday, August 4: Hon. Dennis Archer, former Mayor of Detroit and former Michigan Supreme Court Justice delivers the Keynote Address: “Perceptions of Justice & Judicial Education”
  • From the Editor

    Well, the annual conference of the National Association of State Judicial Educators is upon us. To those of you who will be in Chicago next week for the conference, I want to say that I look forward to seeing you there. To those of you who will not be attending this year, I want to tell you that I will be posting updates on the conference during the week. Additionally, we will be posting other new content next week, so please check the NASJE News website regularly next week for annual conference updates and new articles.

    Since the annual conference marks the transition for NASJE from one year to the next, I also wanted to take this opportunity to let the readers of NASJE News know that we have some new, and we hope exciting, things planned for the next year. Our goal is to make NASJE News a more dynamic portal for news and information about judicial branch education.

    Over the past year, we have revamped the resources section of the NASJE website as well as streamlined how parts of the website function. In the next week, to coincide with the annual conference, we will be rolling out a “Coming Events” section on the main page, as well as a web accessible calendar for NASJE meetings, webcasts, etc.

    In the coming months, we will be transitioning from a periodically published electronic newsletter to a news aggregator format. We will still publish regular features and other major articles on a periodic basis (quarterly to start, transitioning to monthly in the future), but we will increasingly focus on publishing short, timely articles and links to content relevant to judicial branch education. And it is with respect to this endeavor that I want to ask two things of you, our readers.

    First, I ask for your support and patience as we grow into a new type of news site. Over the past two years that I have served as first co-editor and now editor of the NASJE news, we have experienced some instances where the transition from the leadership of Phil Schopick, who expertly edited the NASJE News for many years, has been challenging. I foresee more challenges in the future as we work to make NASJE News a site that you will check weekly, or maybe even daily, for news and information that will help you in your professional life. So please bear with us as we grow, and also please know that your suggestions are always welcome.

    Second, I ask you to send me any news articles or resources that you believe would be interesting to the readers of NASJE News. These may be articles or resources on judicial education, adult education, faculty development, stress management, team building, etc. In other words, I am looking for anything that would give the readers of NASJE News information that would be helpful in their professional endeavors.

    Thank you,
    John Newell
    Editor, NASJE News

  • Looking Back to Look Forward

    by Margaret R. Allen, NASJE Vice-President

    Over the past several months, the NASJE Board has been moving toward starting a strategic planning process.  In February at the Mid-Year Meeting, the Board spent a day with Karen Thorson doing some exercises to start assessing where NASJE is as an organization, where we might want to go in terms of a strategic direction, and possibilities for how to get there.

    The NASJE Policies and Procedures document indicates that the Board should revisit the strategic plan every three years; however, the last plan was completed in 2003.  As we prepared to meet in February, we looked back at the strategic planning process from 1992-1994 to see how our predecessors approached the process to inform our own plans.

    In this article, we’ll look at the first major strategic planning process, led primarily by Larry Stone, NASJE President from 1992-1994. That’s right! Officer terms were then two years, but that was to change as a result of thinking and planning by the Board.

    In his NASJE News President’s Letters, Larry first talked about the impetus for undertaking the process. Membership had grown from its original size of 15-20 members, and NASJE was getting noticed by other national groups, including the Conference of Chief Justices. In 1992, CCJ endorsed our Principles and Standards of Judicial Education.

    At the February 1992 Mid-year Board meeting, five goals were identified:

    • Further the professional education and growth and broaden the experience of those involved in judicial education.
    • Develop, promote and support professionalism in judicial education and court support personnel training through standards for continuing education of state judges and court support personnel.
    • Promote and facilitate the exchange, development, and dissemination of state-of-the-art educational materials, techniques, ideas, policies, technologies, etc., through various methods, such as a clearinghouse, annual convention, technical assistance, personal interaction, and networking among members and others.
    • Represent and advance the interests of the state and local judicial education community.
    • Promote the value of continuing education for judges and court support personnel.

    In addition, seven areas were identified for further discussion:

    • Membership composition
    • Membership involvement
    • Networking
    • Project management
    • Continuing education
    • Relations with others
    • Board member responsibilities.

    At the 1992 conference, the participants discussed these seven topics in small groups, and many of the ideas generated informed future Board work and were in fact implemented as NASJE practice or policy. Some of those ideas, which are still in use today, are as follows:

    • More active involvement of the regional directors in the administration of the association
    • Mentor program for new members
    • Use of a secretariat service for administrative support
    • Ideas to improve networking among members.

    Other elements of the 1992-94 strategic planning process included sending essays on pros and cons related to the seven topics listed above, and asking for member feedback. Once the feedback was received, the Board reviewed it and in some cases, suggested changes to the bylaws, including, among others, that regional directors be elected by members of their regions, rather than the entire membership; and changing the terms of president, president-elect and vice president to one year rather than two.

    Regarding the shorter terms for the vice president, president-elect and president, the intention was to allow more members to serve as president, and certainly to make the commitment shorter and more manageable (four years rather than eight, counting the past president term). The Board noted that the more rapid transition through these leadership positions increased the importance of cooperative Board work to create continuity for the Association.

    The current Board is returning to this idea of gathering information from members at the annual conference. In fact, at the plenary session on Tuesday, NASJE President Jill Goski, President-Elect Kelly Tait and Vice President Margaret Allen will co-present with Dr. Maureen Conner to explore elements of change leadership at both an individual and organizational level.

    Looking back allows us to learn from our predecessors and build on their efforts as we move forward. The Board thanks you in advance for your participation in this process in the coming months. We hope that every member will be part of envisioning and creating NASJE’s future.

  • Introducing National Judicial College President Chad Schmucker

    by Hon. Bill Kelly, Michigan
    Reprinted with permission from the National Judicial College Faculty Forum

    Chad Schmucker, the State Court Administrator of Michigan, has been chosen to be the eighth president of the National Judicial College. He follows in the footsteps of V. Robert Payant who served as the sixth president of the NJC from 1990-1998 and was also was the State Court Administrator in Michigan.

    Chad Schmucker graduated from the University of Michigan receiving a BBA with honors and from Wayne State University Law School. He served as a general jurisdiction court judge in the Circuit Court in Jackson, Michigan for 20 years and as an acting Probate judge for one year and has served as the State Court Administrator for Michigan for two years. He assisted in starting four problem solving courts in Jackson, Michigan including felony drugs/alcohol, domestic violence, family dependency and mental health. He served as the Drug Recovery Court judge for four years. As State Court Administrator, he oversaw management of the state’s 246 trial courts, implemented a Michigan version of trial court performance measures, and developed a plan for court governance to promote cooperation and efficiency among courts.

    He has served as a frequent lecturer for the Michigan Judicial Institute and the Michigan Institute for Continuing Legal Education on various topics including: Domestic Violence, Family Law, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Trial Advocacy, Case and Time Management for Judges, Working with Self-represented Litigants, Starting a Mental Health Court, and Evidence Based Sentencing.

    Prior to his service on the bench, he was in private practice for 14 years and served as a school board trustee for four years.

    Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr., said Schmucker helped drive important reforms for Michigan’s justice system. “Without a doubt, Judge Schmucker’s vision, ability, and courage began a transformation of Michigan’s judiciary,” Young said. “With his leadership, we eliminated unnecessary judgeships and consolidated trial court leadership for greater efficiency and accountability. He led the effort to have our courts use performance metrics to analyze and improve public service. Michigan courts expanded their use of technology, with a wide range of benefits to the public. Thanks in large part to Judge Schmucker, our state courts are working smarter for a better Michigan.”

    Chad has been married to Joyce for 32 years and have 4 children and seven grandchildren aged two months to 11 years old.

    As a Michigan District Judge, I have seen Chad Schmucker reach out to the judges to solicit their input concerning the Supreme Court’s initiatives and concerning legislation which might impact the courts. He prepared several YouTube videos to explain to judges and administrators new ideas from the State Court Administrative Office. He is innovative and personable. We will miss you as the State Court Administrator in Michigan.

  • Dr. Patricia H. Murrell Retires — Her Impact Reverberates

    by Kelly Tait

    Dr. Pat Murrell has retired after setting a continuing standard of excellence in judicial branch education. Her work enriched the professional development of more than 4,000 judges and other court personnel throughout the United States, Canada, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe.

    Anyone who went through one of Dr. Pat Murrell’s judicial education programs came away with both professional and personal growth. On a broad scale, she instilled the principles of adult development and learning in judicial branch education. On a more personal level, she ensured participants’ deep consideration of the importance of competence and character. Her significant impact on program participants was multiplied by the participants implementing what they learned, creating ongoing ripple effects in the justice system.

    Dr. Murrell started working at the University of Memphis in 1970, becoming the Director of the Center for the Study of Higher Education there in 1988. Her responsibilities included directing the Leadership Institute in Judicial Education (LIJE) and the Institute for Faculty Excellence in Judicial Education (IFEJE) from 1989-2007.

    The Institutes provided intensive, experiential seminars that fully involved the participants—judicial educators, judges, and court staff, among others—and prepared them to share their expertise and assume leadership roles in their organizations and jurisdictions. Dr. Murrell fostered a hands-on approach with an emphasis on values, innovation, and application.

    The Leadership Institute in Judicial Education workshops explored adult development and adult education: how we learn, how we change across the adult lifecycle, and how we become more complex thinkers. Participants, using a team approach, built on these foundations to develop innovative projects that continue to benefit the justice system.

    In the Institute for Faculty Excellence in Judicial Education, Dr. Murrell and her team taught participants how to design and develop effective educational sessions in an active, supportive learning environment. The Institute included a strong mentoring component. Excellence in professional and personal development was a hallmark of these programs.  

    Dr. Murrell received numerous awards for her work in judicial education including the State Justice Institute’s Howell Heflin Award, the National Center for State Courts’ Warren Burger Award, and the American Law Institute/American Bar Association’s Harrison Tweed Award. A tribute to Dr. Murrell’s accomplishments in the field of judicial branch education and as a professor at the University of Memphis was held on January 10, 2014.

    The effects of Dr. Pat Murrell’s dedicated, heart-felt work are profound and lasting. A lifelong learner as well as teacher, she continues to have a positive impact on those around her even in retirement.

    “The courage to teach is the courage to keep one’s heart open in those very moments when the heart is asked to hold more than it is able so that the teacher and students and subject can be woven into the fabric of community that learning and living require.” ~Parker Palmer, The Courage to Teach

  • NASJE members take part in IOJT Conference

    NASJE at IOJT
    NASJE members Dr. Caroline Kirkpatrick, Anne Jordan, Meredith Hofford, Maureen Conner, Jill Goski and Lee Ann Barnhardt at the Library of Congress.

    NASJE was well-represented at the 6th International Organization for Judicial Training Conference held in Washington, D.C., in November.

    The theme of the conference was judicial excellence. Judicial excellence is the foundation of justice systems that are trusted by the public to resolve disputes with fairness, efficiency, and impartiality. The 6th IOJT Conference explored different ways in which judicial education can support, promote, and instill judicial excellence. Under the overall theme of judicial excellence the conference focused on:

    • Leadership and Judicial Education
    • Judicial Skill Building
    • Technology and Judicial Education
    • Judicial Education and the Academy
    • Judicial Education in Support of Justice System Reform, Independent, and Accountability

    Several NASJE members taught sessions at the conference. Maureen Conner, Michigan State University, spoke on Leadership Skills for Judicial Educators. William Brunson, National Judicial College, was on panels discussing Judicial Education as a Social or Institutional Change Agent and Technology in Support of Judicial Education. Christy Tull, Ohio Judicial College presented on Judicial Education Program Evaluation. John Meeks, National Center for State Courts, took part in a panel discussion on Election Law. Joseph Sawyer, National Judicial College, spoke on The Online Judicial Learning Environment.

    In addition NASJE members took part in a Knowledge Fair with displays by IOJT member organizations and selected businesses that provide education technology products and services. Members staffed the NASJE booth during the fair, promoting the organization to the international audience.

    Special events during the conference were a reception at the United States Supreme Court and a Gala Dinner at the Library of Congress. Historic tours were also available for participants.

    The International Organization for Judicial Training (IOJT) was established in 2002 in order to promote the rule of law by supporting the work of judicial education institutions around the world. The mission of the IOJT is realized through international and regional conferences and other exchanges that provide opportunities for judges and judicial educators to discuss strategies for establishing and developing training centers, designing effective curricula, developing faculty capacity, and improving teaching methodology.

    The IOJT is a volunteer, non-profit organization and relies upon the efforts and good will of its members. The organization is governed by a General Assembly of its members which meets every 2-3 years during the international conference. There is an elected Board of Governors which consists of an Executive Committee, Regional Deputy Presidents, additional Deputy Presidents and Governors. As of September 2013, the IOJT has 115 member-institutes from 69 countries.

    To find out more about IOJT go to www.iojt.org.