Category: News

  • NASJE Member Assumes New Role for Missouri Bar

    Anthony Simones
    Dr. Anthony Simones and Judge Patricia Breckenridge

    Dr. Anthony Simones, a NASJE member since 2011, has resigned from his position as Manager of Judicial Education and Programming for the Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator and taken a position as Director of Citizenship Education for the Missouri Bar.

    Dr. Simones worked extensively with the Supreme Court of Missouri’s Civic Education Committee in the six years he was with OSCA. This new position will allow him to focus exclusively on what he characterized as his “favorite part of the job.” “I had only been with OSCA for about a month when Judge Patricia Breckenridge of the Supreme Court, the Chair of the Civic Education Committee, asked me to be involved with her initiative,” Simones says. “What I didn’t realize at the time was that Judge Breckenridge was giving me the opportunity to lay the foundation for my dream job.”

    In his new position, Dr. Simones will design, coordinate and deliver presentations and programming to Missourians about the necessity of a fair and impartial judiciary, the importance of the rule of law and the protection of civil liberties. He will also work with middle and high schools throughout Missouri to create and offer competitions designed to enhance students’ understanding of our constitutional system and to encourage their interest in, and involvement with, the system of justice.

    “The Executive Director of the Missouri Bar, Sebrina Barrett, encouraged me to continue my involvement in the leadership of NASJE,” says Simones. A member of the NASJE Board of Directors for over three years, Dr. Simones is the current vice president of the organization.

    “This new job will allow me to utilize my experience as a Professor of Constitutional Law, the work I have done with the Supreme Court of Missouri and what I have learned from NASJE,” Simones says. “In many ways, I have been preparing for this position for my entire professional career.”

  • Member Minute: Shawn Marsh

    Shawn Marsh
    Shawn Marsh

    Introducing NASJE Member Shawn Marsh.

    1. What was your path to judicial education?
    Primarily my relationship and employment with the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges starting in 2003. Most recently I worked for them as the Chief Program Officer for Juvenile Law, which I did until 2016, when I left for the University of Nevada, Reno. However I also did work with courts earlier in my career with the State of Alaska Division of Juvenile Justice.

    2. How long have you worked at your organization?
    I’ve worked at the University of Nevada, Reno in my current role since 2016, but have worked with them on-and-off in various capacities since 2002.

    3. If you could do another job for just one day, what would it be?
    Pilot.

    4. What do you like to do when you’re not at work?
    Putter around the house, home improvement.

    5. What’s your favorite movie?
    This Is Spinal Tap.

  • Online education report available now

    The NASJE Futures Committee is pleased to share their report on online education.

    The purpose of this report is to update NASJE leadership and members about the process and findings of an August 2017 member survey on the topics of distance learning and learning management systems.

    This report includes a detailed look at what people are doing in online education, what they think of it, and why they use the technology they use.

    You can access the Online Education Report from the Futures Committee in the NASJE Member area.

  • Marty Sullivan Promoted in Arkansas

    Marty Sullivan
    Marty Sullivan

    Marty Sullivan, who’s been interim director of the Administrative Office of the Courts, has been chosen the permanent director, Chief Justice Dan Kemp announced today.

    Sullivan has worked in the office since 2003 and as education director since 2007. He’s a political science graduate of UA-Little Rock and holds master’s degrees from UA-Little Rock and Michigan State, the latter in judicial administration.

    For more information, please read the Arkansas Times article.

  • Christine Christopherson Promoted in Nebraska

    Christine Chrisopherson
    Christine Christopherson

    Christine Christopherson was promoted from Director of Court Staff Education to the Interim Director of Judicial Branch Education to encompass probation, court staff, and judges. Christopherson had been with the Supreme Court of Nebraska for about seven months.

    With the departure of Shela Shanks, former State Bar Commission Director/Counsel on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, the Administrative Office of the Courts and Probation has taken the opportunity to refocus the leadership of the Judicial Branch Education Division and the Attorney Services Division which had a shared administrator.  The separation will allow each to focus directly on the constituency served by their respective division. This change will become fully effective October 16, 2017.

    Judicial Branch Education
    Christine Christopherson will serve as Interim Director of Judicial Branch Education. The division will continue to provide education for judges, court staff, and probation staff as guided by the Judicial Branch Education Advisory Committee.

    Attorney Services Division

    The Attorney Services Division, which oversees regulation of the legal profession and the provision of services by the Nebraska Supreme Court to all attorneys licensed in Nebraska, will continue under the leadership of Administrator Carole McMahon-Boies and will add Director of Admissions to her role.   Attorney services will maintain the management of Mandatory Continuing Legal Education, attorney licensure, and bar examination.
    The Counsel for Discipline, under the leadership of Mark Weber, will continue with the primary duty of investigation of disciplinary complaints against attorneys. The office will take on responsibilities and duties related to the Unauthorized Practice of Law formerly handled by Ms. Shanks.

  • NASJE Members’ NACM Annual Conference Sessions Available Online

    The sessions that Margaret Allen and Kelly Tait, both past presidents of NASJE, presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Court Management (NACM) and the International Association for Court Administration (IACA) in July 2017 were selected to be live-streamed and recorded.

    Margaret Allen co-presented a session with the Center for Court Innovation’s Emily LaGratta on “The Evidence behind Effective Customer Service: Procedural Justice and Fair Treatment.” Kelly Tait taught a session on “Implicit Bias: How Our Amazing Brains Can Lead Us Astray.”

    Recordings of their sessions as well as others from the conference are available at the NACM website or you can stream them below.

    KELLY TAIT: Implicit Bias- How Our Amazing Brains Can Lead Us Astray

    MARGARET ALLEN & EMILY LAGRATTA: The Evidence Behind Effective Customer Service- Procedural Justice and Fair Treatment

  • NASJE Mentor Program needs volunteers

    By Lee Ann Barnhardt, Co-Chair Membership and Mentor Committee

    The Membership and Mentor Committee is looking for individuals to serve as mentors for new members.

    The origins of mentoring can be traced back to ancient Greek mythology. When Odysseus went to fight in the Trojan War, he put his trusted friend, Mentor, in charge of his son, Telemachus. Ever since, the term ‘mentor’ has generally come to define someone with more experience, imparting their wisdom and values on someone with less experience.

    You don’t need to be a Greek warrior to be a NASJE mentor, but you do need to be willing to share your passion for judicial branch education with others. The time commitment for a mentor/mentee relationship is typically 6-12 months, but the way that time is structured is flexible to fit individual needs and schedules.

    If you mentor people in NASJE, you learn things about how things work at different levels and in different places. You learn things that make you a better educator and leader. You build your network. When you share your knowledge and experiences you can change the world for that person.

    Mentoring is about teaching. When you teach something to another person, you discover all of the details that you don’t completely understand yourself. That means mentors make themselves smarter in the process of teaching others.

    Mentoring is also about relationships among colleagues.  When you mentor, it also increases your feeling of connection to your colleagues and to our organization. And, if you and your mentee continue working in the same field, you gain a valuable ally and sounding board for years to come.

    I have had the honor of being mentored by some of NASJE’s best and also serving as a member. Below are my “Top 10 Reasons” to be a NASJE Mentor.

    1. You wouldn’t be where you are today it if wasn’t for mentors in your own life.
    2. You meet new people.
    3. You have a positive effect on the organization.
    4. You can change the world for someone.
    5. You learn stuff.
    6. You feel like you did something that matters.
    7. You are motivated to do your own job better.
    8. You build long lasting relationships within other educators.
    9. You can redefine your own career path and goals.
    10. You have the chance to share your passion with others.

    Mentoring also serves the organization. The benefits to NASJE are member retention, increased engagement by members, professional development of members, the transfer of knowledge and skills, and the development of future leaders.

    Remember how confused and stressed out YOU were when you started your new job in judicial branch education?  By acting as a mentor, you can help make the transition easier on someone else.

    The time, the commitment, and the dedication that is involved in mentoring does not go unnoticed. If you are a NASJE mentor now or have been in the past, thank you! If you know a mentor, ask them about their mentoring commitment. You may be surprised at what they have to say about the process.

    If you are interested in serving as a mentor or learning more about the program, NASJE needs you. Please contact Lee Ann Barnhardt, Co-Chair of the Membership and Mentor Committee, at lbarnhardt@ndcourts.gov.

  • NASJE Members: NACM Call for Proposals

    NACM

    NACM’s 2018 Midyear Conference will be held next February in Orange County, California and NACM is looking for great presenters. The conference theme is Bridging the Gap: The Power of Strategic Collaboration. NASJE members have plenty of topics and great speaking skills to offer!

    Please consider expanding your profile and keeping NASJE’s name out there by submitting a speaking proposal for the conference.

    The details are in the announcement here.

  • Member Minute: Eydie Trautwein

    Eydie Trautwein1. What was your path to judicial education? I am an attorney and started working at the Wyoming Supreme Court in 2013. Originally, I was the Wyoming Court Improvement Program (CIP) director, but in November, 2016, my job morphed into the Director of Legal Resources and Judicial Education, a brand new position.

    I now help manage our State Law Library, Judicial Learning Center, Court Improvement Program and Judicial Education. Wyoming is experiencing a significant turnover in our judiciary due to judicial retirements, and our state has made judicial education a top priority, hence the creation of my position.

    2. How long have you worked at your organization? I have worked for the Wyoming Supreme Court for almost 4 years.

    3. If you could do another job for just one day, what would it be? I would like to be a movie director.

    4. What do you like to do when you’re not at work? I like to spend time with my family (I have a 5 and 6 year old), golf, run, garden and hang out on our family ranch.

    5. What’s your favorite movie? Tremors.

  • Judicial Education Manager Insights

    Middle Schoolers and Judges: Observations from a First Year Judicial Education Manager

    by Bryan Walker

    Bryan Walker
    Bryan Walker

    One of the few interview questions I was prepared for was, “We can see you have a lot of experience working with students, but tell us about your experience working with adult learners.” In the back of my mind, I was thinking how much different could it be? My belief has always been that great teachers can teach anybody. The student’s age does not matter. My first disclaimer: I do not consider myself a great teacher. I have, however, found success as a teacher and coach. In my opinion, certificates and degrees have never determined the efficacy of a teacher. I have seen many teachers with Ph.Ds. who fail to connect with learners. As Jack Anderson Pidgeon, the headmaster of the private Kiski School in Saltsburg noted , “Teaching must flow from within. Teaching is an art.” I guess I relayed this message well to the interview committee. I have just completed my first year as judicial education manager with The National Judicial College in Reno, Nevada.

    Of all the students I have had the privilege of working with, I believe middle schoolers are the most fascinating. I’ve spent 18 years in the world of independent schools as a teacher, coach, and administrator. Over the course of these years, I’ve learned many pedagogical lessons. I found it important to write these down in order to survive in the middle school environment.

    At the beginning of my teaching career as a middle school math and science teacher, I learned the most important lessons did not revolve around content, but rather ensuring students were establishing a foundation for a strong work-ethic, organizational skills, and conducting themselves with some degree of decorum. I later learned as a dean of students, the importance and impact of advisory activities. Advisory activities would ensure every student is connected with an adult on-campus. Focusing a large amount of time providing a safe environment for students led to an increase in student achievement. Learners and their relationships with teachers are critical for success to occur. As the head of a school, I learned the importance of creating a strong foundation of close-knit relationships within the student body. When influential students study, every student studies. If influential students party, everyone parties. An environment conducive to learning can only be created with the “trend setters” on-board. Malcolm Gladwell’s “Law of the Few” (Gladwell, 2000) rings true in middle schools. I believe many of these lessons are just as valid in judicial education.

    I have just completed my first year as a judicial education manager. I am now accustomed to primarily working with adults, the judges who serve as participants and faculty members. I am surprised at the pedagogical similarities relating to the first interview question I answered. Observations and insights I have gleaned from my first year of working at the National Judicial College coupled with my many years in K-12 education reveal the surprising similarities between middle schoolers and judges.

    1. Middle schoolers are fragile, curious, and strong-willed. Judges are assertive, keen, and anxious to gain knowledge. Both parties carry an incredibly high degree of expectations and pressure to do their jobs with an incredible number of variables impacting their ability to perform to their potentials.
    2. Middle schoolers, like all judges, want to do well. When a middle schooler feels loved at home, they are able to learn at school. When a school environment is safe, middle schoolers will voluntarily participate. Creating a safe learning environment for judges is equally important. Learners will gain the most out of a class when class participation occurs. Judges want to be active learners in a dynamic classroom. Creating a safe environment for both classrooms allows participation and the exchange of ideas, which is a sign of authentic learning.
    3. Many middle schoolers carry a false sense of bravado. The more intense the bravado, the more care that is usually required. Many judges require the same amount of care. A black robe may portray an intimidating and self-assured front, but the same care and attention for details is required for judges. Judicial educators must ensure the needs of each judge is met for a course to be successful. This can range from changing the classroom seating arrangements to altering the delivery of content.
    4. Mastering the art of teaching is required to connect with both middle schoolers and judges. There are so many changes happening with the students’ adolescent bodies, teachers must cater lessons to students’ excitement, lethargy, or mood swings. Judges also need each lesson to be presented concisely and coherently to ensure the small window of time they have for professional development is maximized.
    5. Many girls in middle school are more physically capable. This trait allows girls to be more confident in some areas of school, leading to a more successful academic experience. Although there are fewer female judges in my courses, I have noticed female judges are generally very active participants. I have seen female judges maximize the opportunity to attend a course through lively participation.
    6. Many middle school teachers I have worked with are relatively young and are inexperienced teachers. They are newbies to teaching. Many judges are also newbies to teaching. Judges, however, possess a wealth of experience from the bench. A breadth and depth of content knowledge is not always associated with being a great teacher. Effective teaching requires a connection with the students through common ground. This connection cannot be assumed. It must be identified and tapped into.
    7. Middle schoolers and judges seek autonomy. Teachers should teach in such a way that learners discover the answers on their own. In both environments, teachers need to create environments where they empower students to gain knowledge on their own. Middle schoolers and judges do not want anything handed to them.
    8. Middle schoolers believe no one understands them. These years can be a difficult time in their lives. They are seeking relationships with peers and crave the opportunity to be part of something bigger. Like middle schoolers, judges crave the opportunity to foster collegial relationships. When judges have the opportunity to be collegial, they share experiences and gain knowledge that impacts their daily decision making.
    9. Middle schoolers must be active learners to fully understand a concept. Lessons should actively involve students and ensure relevancy for improved retention rates. Judges also require interactive and relevant courses. There are too many emails, too many cases, and too many other responsibilities vying for their attention. The lessons must be engaging and relevant to be worthwhile for the judges.