Category: News

  • BOOK REVIEW: Crossing the Yard: Thirty Years as a Prison Volunteer

    Review written by Nancy Fahey Smith, NASJE Western Region Director and Field Trainer for Arizona Superior Court in Tucson, Arizona.

    Crossing the YardGET IT AT AMAZON

    A couple of times a year, the training division at the Arizona Superior Court in Tucson, AZ, sponsors a book club for continuing education credit, led by NASJE member Nancy Smith. In May of 2016, Club Read members met to discuss the book Crossing the Yard, by Professor Richard Shelton (2007, University of Arizona Press). If ever there was a book perfect for law and literature, for both court staff and for judicial officers, this profoundly compelling memoir about prisons is it.

    It is difficult to discuss prison conditions with just about anyone. Some are convinced that crime deserves prison, the more time the better. Others are appalled by statistics that reveal the huge number of prisoners in America. Politicians talk about being tough on crime, parents talk about spending more on education instead of on prisons. Private prisons seem to be having a heyday. Recently, much has been made of the number of minorities in American prisons, and the long sentences they serve compared to Whites. We are scared by recidivism rates, yet unwilling, it seems, to spend scarce resources on programs to prevent it. As court personnel, exposed daily to crimes against society, it is easy to become jaded about prison and prisoners.

    Few of us, however, have actually spent any real time in prisons. Perhaps we have had a tour, or maybe even visited a relative or friend there. In reality, we don’t understand what it is like to be in prison.

    Unlike most of us, author Richard Shelton has spent many hours and days trying to help prisoners. In fact, he has spent more than 30 years leading creative writing workshops in Arizona’s prisons. Week in and week out he travels to remote and horrifying locations, working tirelessly to develop real writers out of inmates willing to learn. Along the way, he learned that prisoners are people, and many of them are enormously talented people who made bad mistakes in their lives and landed in prison.

    Professor (emeritus) of Creative Writing at the University of Arizona in Tucson, Shelton wrote Crossing the Yard, a memoir of his experiences in Arizona prisons and full of stories that will inspire and disgust readers, with the goal of enlightening people to what really goes on inside prisons. He began trekking to the state prison in Florence, AZ after receiving a letter from a particularly infamous prisoner who asked Shelton to critique his writing. While many of Shelton’s adventures are downright scary, others are full of humor and hopefulness. The prisoners in Shelton’s workshops taught him many lessons, especially to be patient, forgiving and kind.

    Shelton writes “Oh, these men in orange. I’ve learned more from them than I ever taught them, and it’s been good stuff…They have taught me to be patient; never to whine no matter what; to expect the worst and be happy if I get anything else; to be loyal, to be forgiving, to be kind. They have taught me that we are all law breakers and we are all victims of crime. They have taught me that growing old is no disgrace, but that a youth, wasted in prison, is a disaster.” (p. 227) Several of Shelton’s inmate students became published authors, like Jimmy Santiago Baca and Ken Lamberton, and more than a few became his friends. More often than not, workshop members found a reason for living and for staying out of trouble once released.

    What really angers Shelton is the inhumane way prisoners are treated: “I want to put my head down on the table in front of me and weep with a pain that will not be comforted and a rage I cannot express.” (p. 232) He finds prison administrators inept and uncaring; prison policies arbitrary, ineffective, and cruel; the conditions horrible and inhumane; and the bureaucracy impossible. He rages that society simply throws so many people away, when after spending time with them Shelton finds that they are human beings deserving of forgiveness. He is not so naïve to believe that all prisoners are redeemable, but he believes that many are and all should at least be treated with dignity and respect while imprisoned.

    Crossing the Yard provoked much soul searching when we discussed it in the Superior Court book club. Members of the group were overall pretty appalled at what they read, and came away with altered perspectives about those they see put away every day in their jobs. The group was surprised at the prevalence of drugs and racism in the prisons, but not really at the number of mentally ill serving time. Shelton’s stories and examples convinced group members that prisoners deserve a second chance to be contributing members of society. Prison does not have to be a place that destroys a person’s humanity, and many prisoners can be redeemed given the chance and the resources. Professor Shelton’s workshops provided just such a resource to its members.

    Most of all, Shelton’s book taught group members what prison is really like for most prisoners. The picture is not pretty.

    Professor Shelton writes very well and is a wonderful storyteller. The grim stories are interspersed with heartwarming stories of success and plenty of good humor. He also provides a reading list, and those who take the list and read the writing of workshop participants will be amazed at the powerful poetry, prose and art that leap from the pages of their work.

    With sentencing reform and prison reform currently on the agenda in many states and at the federal level, a book like Crossing the Yard can serve to illuminate why such reforms are vital. As judicial branch educators, we are always on the lookout for essential learning resources to guide our work. Crossing the Yard by Richard Shelton is one such resource.

    NAJSE members can access the discussion questions created for the Book Club discussion in Tucson, as well as a link to a PBS video interview of Professor Shelton on the Members Area of this website.

  • Western Region Meeting Materials Now Available

    Western RegionOn August 11, 2016 NASJE’s Western Region hosted a meeting where we shared ways to approach teaching and facilitating discussions about the difficult topics of racism, prejudice and implicit bias in the judicial branch with judges and court staff. The documents provided by presenters can be found in the NASJE Member Area. Unfortunately, a link to the meeting recording is unavailable.

    Michael Roosevelt shared how he and colleagues have approached the topic recently with staff at the California Center for Judicial Education and Research (CJER), while Jason Mayo of California shared the comprehensive, long-term plan for teaching the topics there. Jesse Walker of Washington shared the outline of a judicial conference to be held next spring which revolves around the topic and different ways these issues come up in a variety of sessions over three days. The film 3 ½ Seconds: 10 Bulletforms the nucleus for the conference. Educators from five Western states participated in the web-based meeting.

  • Melody Laney Luetkehans receives the National Judicial College 2015 Staff Excellence Award

    Melody LuetkehansNASJE member Melody Laney Luetkehans has received the National Judicial College 2015 Staff Excellence Award.

    The NJC website also has an interview with Melody as part of their Spotlight on Staff series.

    Congratulations to Melody for her excellent work in Judicial Branch Education!

    NASJE members: Have you done something worth sharing on our website? Let’s show everyone some of the great things NASJE members do! Please contact the Communications Committee at nasjenews@gmail.com with any newsworthy items.

  • Upcoming NASJE Webcast – New Course Development Resource: The NACM Core

    Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016
    Time: 12pm Pacific / 1pm Mountain / 2pm Central / 3pm Eastern (1 hour)

    Paul DeLosh
    Paul DeLosh

    As judicial educators, our challenge is to develop courses year after year that are relevant, engaging, and provide the most up-to-date information.

    We use a variety of resources to accomplish this daunting task, and this year, our partners at the National Association for Court Management (NACM) have released thirteen curriculum designs that align with the NACM Core, the updated version of the NACM Core Competencies.

    In this 1-hour webcast scheduled for August 31, 2016 at 3pm ET, NACM Board member Paul DeLosh will discuss the process he led to update the NACM Core and develop the accompanying curriculum designs. (Fun fact: NASJE Past President Robin Wosje worked with NACM to create the curriculum designs in her former role at the Justice Management Institute.)

    Dr. Anthony Simones
    Dr. Anthony Simones

    Dr. Anthony Simones, Manager of Judicial Education in Missouri and NASJE Midwest Regional Director, will join Mr. DeLosh to discuss how he used the new Purposes and Responsibilities curriculum to develop a presentation for Missouri Municipal Court staff to begin addressing the problems that gave rise to Ferguson. This presentation is a preview of a full-length session Dr. Simones will present at our 2016 Fall Conference in Burlington.

    As a result of attending this 1-hour session, participants will be able to:

    • Locate information regarding the NACM Core and the curriculum designs
    • Compare the NACM Core to other curricula for judicial
      officers and court staff
    • Use the curriculum designs as part of the course development process

    We can all use more resources to make the education we develop current, relevant and engaging for those we serve. The NACM Core and accompanying materials will be an excellent addition to your toolbox!

  • NASJE “Article Club” Hosted by Curriculum and Education Committee

    By Christine Christopherson, National Center for State Courts

    What do you get when you cross a book club and a conference call? A “callinar,” of course! It was our pleasure as the Curriculum and Education Committee to host the very first ever “callinar” for judicial branch educators on April 28, 2016. For our first article we discussed “Do You Suffer from Decision Fatigue?” by John Tierney, which focused on a very relevant topic that allowed us all to learn from one another.

    This callinar idea began with an article that Leigh Ferguson, NASJE member from Tennessee, first read shortly after taking her bar exam several years ago, and she said it has changed the way she approaches decision making. It sparked a conversation about how, as a committee, we might bring different types of learning opportunities to other judicial educators outside of the formal conference without asking already busy professionals to commit to too much additional work. The callinar seemed like a fun way to create a learning space that educators can really use to learn from one another and participate in a conversation. A wide variety of educators from across the country attended the inaugural 90-minute session, and to the committee’s delight, they actively participated and interacted during the session.

    Tony Simones prompted the discussion with the question, “Do you buy into it (the idea of decision fatigue)? The first time I read it I thought, here we go again another way to make excuses for bad behavior. What are your thoughts?” Many shared their concerns about skepticism, but once those were aired, the conversation turned to examples of this very phenomenon taking place throughout the courts. Some shared ways they themselves have suffered from decision fatigue, while others offered ways it may apply to people with whom they work. Some educators also mentioned the possible need for food at conferences or even on the bench in the afternoon in order to avoid decision fatigue in those settings. Another comment reflected the idea that harder decisions could also impact the level of fatigue. Hence, those making higher stakes decisions could suffer from a higher level of decision making fatigue.

    We wrapped-up the conversation with a question about the types of changes we can make in order to lessen the impacts of decision fatigue. Most educators agreed that they make the best decisions when they are feeling grounded, centered, and whole. Another participant shared some research about the biological factors that promote or detract from high performance. Another raised the issue of decision making and poverty — is poverty a trap? Does living in poverty impact the decisions people make? If so, what is the level of awareness of judicial officers in this regard, and how will that impact those we serve? Another great implication to consider.

    In the end, it was the consensus of the group that in order to make real impactful changes, there would need to be buy-in from the bench. The group discussed when might be the best time to schedule sessions that might challenge the status quo. Another discussed providing better types of food at meetings and conferences to encourage better decision making and active participation. Another suggested starting with other working groups such as line staff or court reporters. Participants provided some great suggestions for working towards opening others up to this idea and making changes to have a positive impact with regards to decision making in the courts.

    Overall, callinar participants enjoyed great conversation and appreciated the format. The committee will be hosting one more “callinar” on July 14th, 2016 based on the NASJE news article “#I am Fruitvale#: An Approach to Teaching Court Staff about Racism, Prejudice and Implicit Bias.” Stay tuned for further information and details.

    Christine ChristophersonChristine Christopherson has been an educator for about 25 years. She has worked in Adult Education since 2003, with experience teaching Community Education, GED courses, Parenting, Domestic Violence, and Criminal Thinking. Christine became the Judicial Branch Educator for the State of South Dakota in 2012, where she was the sole staff member in charge of coordinating, planning, implementing, and tracking all education programs for court staff and judges. In 2014 she and her family moved to Williamsburg, VA where she accepted a position as the Curriculum Developer for ICM, primarily charged with revising and updating courses along with conducting and developing faculty development programs. Currently, Christine serves as the Curriculum Development Manager for ICM. She is currently a member of the Fellows class of 2017.

  • Curriculum and Education Committee to Host Second “article club” Session

    The second “article club” is scheduled for Thursday, July 14 from 11:00 – 12:30 (PT), 12:00 – 1:30 (MT), 1:00-2:30 (CT) and 2:00 – 3:00 (ET).

    The April 28, 2016, “article club” was a success and now it is time for the second one. These “article club” style phone conferences were created to bring NASJE members together in conversations about topics of interest to judicial educators.

    The second article chosen by the committee is “#IAmFruitvale#: An Approach to Teaching Court Staff about Racism, Prejudice and Implicit Bias” by Matthew Estes and Nancy Smith. The article relates how these educators were inspired by the movie Fruitvale Station, how they set out to teach the class and the response they received. Their experience raises the larger issue of how judicial educators should address controversial subjects.

    Food for thought from the article . . . “Opinions vary widely as to whether racism exists, to what degree, and in what parts of the system.  It seems to be an apt topic for judicial educators to tackle as they seek to provide meaningful educational events for judicial branch employees at all levels.” “Can the topic be explored in a classroom setting to judicial branch employees without provoking anger and defensiveness?”

    This session will be held in a conference call format, and will be moderated by members of the committee. Space is limited. To register and receive the conference call access code information, please contact Anthony.Simones@courts.mo.gov.

  • Martha Martin, Florida Chief of Court Education, retires

    NASJE member Martha Martin, who served as the Chief of Court Education in Florida for 11 years, retired June 9, 2016.

    Martha began her career practicing oil and gas law in Oklahoma City. She came to Florida in 1999 to work as senior attorney in judicial education, and was named Chief of Court Education in 2005. Her contributions to NASJE include about five years as Secretary to the Association. She also served as a member of the Curriculum Committee, working hand in hand with Christie Tull, Karen Thorson and others to produce the NASJE curriculum designs. Faculty development has long been a special interest of Martha’s. Many thanks to Martha for her valuable contributions to NASJE!

    Martha plans to (finally) practice piano consistently in retirement, and she will endeavor to study Italian as well. While she may do some consulting, she wishes mainly to enjoy a more carefree lifestyle. She sends her best wishes to all her wonderful NASJE colleagues.

  • Open Space: The All Coffee Break Conference

    Empowering Learners to Control their Own Learning

    By Stephanie Hemmert

    When I began working at the Federal Judicial center ten years ago, I first heard of a learning conference concept called “open space.” You may have heard of it or even used it. It seemed so odd to me! Basically, learners come together with a predetermined, overarching topic for a specific amount of time with no specific agenda topics predefined at all. Some people call this an “unconference” or “open conference.”

    Until I first saw the open space concept in practice, I was confused and skeptical. Hundreds of people flying in from around the country for about two and a half days with absolutely NO initial agenda other than start and end times?! What? Then I saw the concept in action. I experienced how scores of agenda topics can be developed in real-time, how hundreds of people (I experienced group sizes from about 25 up to 650!) were enthusiastically engaged throughout the whole program, and how participants walked away with tangible benefits they immediately applied. I began facilitating individual sessions, and then for years I also facilitated participants creating the agenda. I find the process to be a complex, yet simple, educational work of art. It almost seems magical. I would describe it as such if I didn’t know that behind the seeming magic a number of things are actually put into place beforehand and specific concepts are followed during the event to ensure its success.

    For this write-up, I would like to share with you open space “ground rules,” some optimal conditions I’ve found to help it run smoothly and effectively, and a brief history behind it.

    Ground Rules
    I’ll focus on four ground rules or concepts:

    1. The “Law of Two Feet”
    2. “Whoever Comes is the Right People”
    3. “Whatever Happens is the Only Thing That Could Happen,” and
    4. “When It’s Over, It’s Over”

    Some people use slightly different phrases for the rules as you may find them slightly awkward and/or, let’s be honest, wacky sounding.

    1. “Law of Two Feet.” After the learners come together to build the agenda (more on this to follow), everyone receives a copy of it – showing which topics were scheduled where and when – and learners go to the topic session that interests them the most. Folks with something to give as well as something to gain are encouraged to attend a particular topic of interest to them. The idea of the law of two feet is that when a person feels he or she has nothing more to add or gain from the conversation, he or she moves on to another conversation topic. This may happen multiple times during sessions. The learner is in control. Nobody is offended when someone comes into a conversation later and facilitators do a great job of quickly recapping the highlights of the conversation for these latecomers. It is a constant, fluid process.
    2. “Whoever Comes is the Right People.” Whoever shows up to the individual session is meant to be there. Sometimes people lament over who is not present, but it doesn’t matter. Whoever did come to the session by definition has a vested interest in the discussion and there is information to be shared and discussed.
    3. “Whatever Happens is the Only Thing That Could Happen.” I have been in a session where after about five minutes the participants felt that they answered their questions and that no more needed to be said so everyone moved on to another session. It works! They solved their problems and got a chance to gain even more information from another session. Everyone wins. This concept overall is meant to focus participants on the here and now and not worry about what could’ve and should’ve been.
    4. “When It’s Over, It’s Over.” Similar to the previous rule, when the discussion has run its course, it is time to move on! There is no need to belabor anything and waste time. People take responsibility for their own learning.

    Optimal Conditions
    Participants ‘self-select’ their way into open space discussions, both to the overall learning and to the individual sessions. Once they are there, a critical way to help the learning process is to make people feel welcome and a part of the process and discussions. This applies during the agenda building, by encouraging people to contribute topics they are passionate about, and it also applies during the individual discussions with facilitators making everyone feel welcome and actively involved.

    During the agenda building process, when people nominate a topic, I have found it helpful to ask them to write it down on a fairly large piece of paper with a fat marker and hold it up to the group while announcing it. The person then visibly cements their commitment and passion for the topic and the group has the opportunity to meet the person making the suggestion. Having the topic written down also assists the person who is creating the agenda on the side, filling slots with topics. It may go without saying, but I’ve found it is also helpful to remind people that we strongly encourage the topic nominator to go to the discussion and to be there at least at the beginning.

    Once the topics are assigned to location and time slots it is very helpful to publish an electronic version of the agenda to which everyone has immediate access. A paper agenda is also possible, but it means there is a little more downtime with printing and copying before the first session can begin.

    Though not critical, I’ve found assigning facilitators to each session enhances the learning. Facilitators play a major part in moving the discussion along, focusing on encouraging a variety of participants to speak, making each person feel involved in the discussion, quickly recapping major discussion points as new participants join in, and writing major points or bits of learning information (such as a contact name/number) on a flip chart. I have run “Facilitator Refresh” sessions prior to the open space to review basic facilitation concepts, emphasizing specific points such as not being a subject matter expert and highlighting open space concepts such as implications of the Law of Two Feet. With Facilitator Refresh sessions, I like to use the analogy of an orchestra conductor who is inviting music (discussion) to be played from all of the different instruments (participants) in the orchestra (room), keeping the music going until it’s over.

    Having participants sit in a “U” or semi-circle during the individual sessions (and during the agenda creation, if feasible) works best for sharing knowledge and ideas.

    It is helpful to have a note taker assigned to each session to write down key points from the discussion. These can be shared with participants later, and even with people who did not attend the open space. Another aspect that facilitators can help out with is asking and reminding participants to say their name/location each time they speak. This helps the note taker as well as helping the people in the room get to know one another.

    For a multi-day open space conference, I’ve found that reconvening all the participants to regroup and have additional agenda building sessions works well so that the group builds the agenda in segments. As open space progresses participants’ passions widen, curiosities spark, and people have additional questions and think of additional topics. Keep in mind that open space sessions don’t have to be multi-day events. I’ve led open space sessions that last an afternoon, or even just a few hours.

    History
    I cannot talk about open space without giving kudos to Harrison Owen, who first discovered the concept. (He rejects having “invented” it.) Before Owen designed open space, he described how he used to organize and run conferences, and people would comment that the most valuable time they had and where they would gain the most, was from the discussions they had with other participants at a break, over coffee. Sound familiar to anyone? So he set out to design a conference that was all coffee break, so to speak. Brilliant!

    Here’s a great quote by him.

    Open Space runs on two fundamentals: passion and responsibility. Passion engages the people in the room. Responsibility ensures things get done. A focusing theme or question provides the framework for the event. The art of the question lies in saying just enough to evoke attention, while leaving sufficient open space for the imagination to run wild. —Harrison Owen

    I also would be remiss if I didn’t give deep hat tips to my former boss, Judy Roberts, and colleague, Bob Fagan, who introduced me to open space and modeled the key aspects that make it work.

    Please see below for related additional reading on open space. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at shemmert@fjc.gov.

    References
    Owen, Harrison. “Opening Space for Emerging Order.” Open Space World. n.p. n.d. Web. 25, May, 2016.

    Deutsch, Claudia H. “Round-Table Meetings with No Agendas, No Tables.” The New York Times. The New York Times. 5, June, 1994. Web. 26, May, 2016.

    Stephanie HemmertStephanie Hemmert, a Senior Judicial Education Attorney, works with the Federal Judicial Center, a judicial branch agency whose primary mission is education and research for the federal courts. Prior to law school, Stephanie worked in the insurance industry in underwriting and training capacities. All views expressed are her own.

  • NASJE President Margaret Allen accepts new position

    Margaret Allen
    Margaret Allen

    Congratulations to Margaret Allen, NASJE President, who has accepted the position of Director of National Programs at the National Center for State Courts Institute for Court Management.  In her new role, she will collaborate with existing and new partners to deliver ICM education offerings around the country, including the Court Management Program courses, online courses, and other standalone programs that can be customized for your setting.  Other projects will include a role in updating the CMP courses, creating new course offerings, and continuing to provide assistance to partner states, Consortium states, licensees and others. Margaret’s tentative start date is June 13, 2016. She looks forward to the challenges of her new job, and plans to move to Williamsburg with her family over the summer.

  • E-Learning: Just in Time, On Demand, and On the Go!

    Western Region Hosts Webinar on June 16

    NASJE members, are you ready for 21st century e-learning? With suggestions for new technologies and delivery methods popping into every educator’s inbox every day, the challenges of keeping up can be overwhelming! Join Western Region educators Gavin Lane of California and Joseph Sawyer of the National Judicial College as they identify the latest and most persistent trends in distance education and policy implications for this rapidly changing world.

    Gavin and Joseph will help learners understand the relationships between learning outcomes and objectives, learning modalities, and online activities with respect to effective e-learning design and describe effective practices and lessons learned from their distance education experiences. As a bonus, you will learn how e-learning methodologies apply to Kolb’s Circle of Learning.

    This Webinar is open to all current NASJE members. Join us for this exciting event on Thursday, June 16 at 10:00 AM Pacific Time. Registration information will arrive in your inbox soon. For more information, contact Western Region Director Nancy Smith.