Blog

  • Meet NASJE Member Justice Daniel J. Crothers

    North Dakota Supreme Court Justice Daniel J. CrothersOn behalf of the Membership and Mentorship Committee, I’m happy to introduce our newest member, North Dakota Supreme Court Justice Daniel J. Crothers! He was a good sport and participated in our New Member Minute — read more about him below.

    1. What was your path to judicial education?
    While practicing law full time, I was an adjunct college instructor and regularly presented continuing education programs for lawyers (and occasionally, judges). More fully engaging in judicial education seemed like a natural step. Strong support from Judge Michael Keasler helped getting me started with the NJC.

    2. How long have you worked at your organization?
    2005

    3. If you could do another job for just one day, what would it be?
    I have a gazillion interests so narrowing to just one is really hard. But if limited to one job, it probably would be a pilot.

    4. What do you like to do when you’re not at work?
    “Not at work?” Have you seen my docket? Actually, see above about my gazillion interests. A few key ones are fly fishing, kayaking, exploring the road less traveled in my Jeep®, doing about anything related to being outdoors, and all activities involved at both my lake home in Minnesota and my family’s farm-ranch in North Dakota.

    5. What’s your favorite movie?
    Local Hero

  • Fort Worth Court Director Receives National Award

    by Mark Goodner, Deputy Counsel and Director of Judicial Education, TMCEC

    Theresa Ewing
    Theresa Ewing

    Theresa Ewing is the Director of Municipal Court Services for the Fort Worth Municipal Court. Earlier this year, the National Center for State Courts selected Ms. Ewing to receive its 2018 Distinguished Service Award. This award is presented annually to honor those who have made substantial contributions to the field of court administration and to the work of the National Center for State Courts. I was able to sit down with Ms. Ewing recently and ask her questions about the award as well as her work in Fort Worth.

    The National Center for State Courts selected you to be the recipient of the 2018 National Center for State courts Distinguished Service Award presented to honor those who have made substantial contributions to the field of court administration and to the work of the national center. How does it feel to have your name next to those words?
    Humbling… Terrifying… It’s beyond comprehension really because as I look back on the people who have received this award in the past, they’re all of the people that I look to as my mentors and my heroes of court administration over the years and to be recognized among the legends is just humbling.

    You’ve worked in courts for 28 plus years but you came to Texas in 2016. Is there anything that struck you as different about the way that Texas courts work?
    I think one of the biggest distinctions between Texas courts in the municipalities is that this is the first time that I’ve ever worked in the executive branch of government as opposed to the judicial branch of government, and so the relationship factor is so much more important. It really is a mutual relationship on how you run the courts as opposed to the judges [in other states’ systems] dictate how the courts are run and your [the court administrator’s] job is to execute those things. You really do have to have a really symbiotic relationship with your presiding judge in order to make the court function. Before, I’ve always worked in an institution where your chief judge gives the directive and you’re required to execute that. It’s a very different dynamic knowing that there’s not a direct report, but there must be a relationship in order to make the court work most effectively.

    What are you most proud of about your work with the Fort Worth court?
    There are so many things I’m proud of.  My most proud moment is, of course, we instituted warrant forgiveness month which was a success beyond what any of us could’ve ever imagined.  I think one of the other big undertakings is our cross-training and our actual certification of staff in the TMCEC certification levels because that had not been anything that had been previously pursued. We had staff working in silos and bubbles, and didn’t understand the impact of their jobs versus what happened next in the process. So really pushing to get that education piece done and developing leaders in the future courts—that is really what we should all be doing.

    What do you think is the biggest challenge to court administrators you’re so close (either current or coming challenge) that they have to deal with in Texas municipal courts.
    I think it’s not just Texas municipal courts, but nationally, is really engaging the public in relevancy. Why are courts relevant in this day and age when there are so many different alternative methods of dealing with disputes? We talk about ADR. We talk about putting pretrial services in place. We’re trying to put different modalities in place, but trying to get people to remember the courts are the neutral party you can go to. Just because you’ve been accused of a crime doesn’t mean that that’s definitive. People forget that’s why we have we have courts. We have courts because they need to have a place they can come to a neutral arbitrator that can say, “State, you did your thing, now I want to hear the other side of the story.  Did you do your thing right? Let’s put it together and let’s make a final decision.” That’s why courts exist. And we are forgetting that that’s why we exist even at the municipal court level where we see thousands upon thousands of people that have an opportunity to come to a neutral arbitrator. So education and relevancy, for us, has been a big push because if people don’t understand that that’s the role of the court, that’s where you get fear. That’s where you get noncompliance because they’re afraid to come in and talk to us.

    For municipal courts week, we had three different sets of groups come in and do mock trials with us. We had young men and women in high school and junior high walking through metal detectors scared to death about the fact they were coming into a court and they could not believe that we were “nice.” Judge Rodgers and I had an opportunity to talk to all of the groups and say this is what we do with and this is why we exist and have a conversation about judicial versus nonjudicial and the role that the clerks play in the way that justice is administered.

    Judge Rodgers and I will say “Does everybody have to be a lawyer to be in the court?” And, of course, most of the kids are kinda like “yeah” Because there are so many roles (non-attorneys) that get performed that actually support the judicial branch and the judicial functions that nobody realizes. With the stroke of a keystroke, we can put people in jail.  That’s why we’re so important, that’s why it’s so important to distinguish—I am not a customer service rep. I work for a court. I have the opportunity to help in the administration of justice.

    Congratulations to Theresa Ewing on receiving this tremendous honor! Under the leadership of Theresa Ewing and Chief Judge Danny Rodgers, the Fort Worth municipal court is doing great work, and it is wonderful to see this national recognition bestowed upon one of Texas’ own.

  • Meet Judge Kristi Harrington

    We have a new member, Judge Kristi Harrington from Charleston, South Carolina.

    She answered our 5 Member Minute Questions.

    Judge Kristi Harrington
    Judge Kristi Harrington

    1. What was your path to judicial education?
    As a new judge, I was required to go to the National Judicial College. After two weeks of General Jurisdiction, I realized the value of Judicial education. I was asked to help develop a web-based class for new judges and have been faculty ever since!

    2. How long have you worked at your organization?
    I have been with Darkness to Light since September 2018.

    3. If you could do another job for just one day, what would it be?
    I think I would like to be a general practice/primary care doctor. I wanted to go to medical school, but chose law school instead. Two roads diverged…

    4. What do you like to do when you’re not at work?
    My son is a senior in high school so I’m trying to spend as much time with him before he goes to college. I am training for a triathlon.

    5. What’s your favorite movie?
    Serendipity.

  • You Cannot Have A Future Without Change

    Cheryl Fowler
    Cheryl Fowler

    By Cheryl Fowler, Office of Policy & Education
    ESD – OSCA, Oregon Judicial Department

    Like it or not, life is a whirlwind of change. Our society moves at a pace that far exceeds any other time in history and change is a reality we face each day. Change can be a very positive thing when it is implemented effectively, efficiently, and with encouragement. Unfortunately, that doesn’t happen as often as it could or should. But regardless of how change is implemented; regardless of how we feel about it – change is here to stay.

    How do you react? Do you embrace change or do you hate it? If you hate change, do you only dislike the aspects of change that you can’t control? Sometimes you are the initiator of change, but more often you are the one told to make it happen.

    This past spring my “work” world was turned upside down. Through a reorganization process everything I was doing in my job was disbursed, except judicial education, all staff were shifted to other areas, and I felt the dust swirling around me as I wondered how I was going to handle this change. Once it started to settle down to where I could see a few things more clearly, I realized that this change could open possibilities for me that I haven’t had available for several years. One of those was reestablishing my membership with the National Association of State Judicial Educators (NASJE). I knew that this organization would provide me with opportunities, colleagues, and resources to be able to continue the work I have known for the past 18 years and I could provide others with insight and knowledge from my own experiences. I decided it was time for a change and I would embrace it.

    If you view change as a chore, you’ll be much less likely to willingly accept it and use it to your benefit. So how about changing how you react to the possibility of change. When we are faced with change we generally react with an excuse why it shouldn’t happen, can’t possibly happen, or absolutely will not happen. We find all the excuses why change just will not work. What if we think about change differently? Instead of being negative and finding excuses, counter the objection with a new way of thinking. When Thomas Edison was asked why he failed so many times in making the light bulb he said, “I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” Without continuing to move forward he may never have discovered the best solution to make it work. So how do we think differently and change our excuses into reasons to keep moving forward?

    Top 10 Excuses for NOT Changing…and the counter objections!

    1. “We have always done it this way”” Just because it was successful in the past, doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the best way now…or that it will be in the future.
    2. “We have not done that before.” At one time, everything we do now was something we had never done before.
    3. “We tried that before and failed.” Unless all conditions and circumstances are exactly the same, failure of the past should not dictate our successes of the future.
    4. “If it isn’t broke, let’s not fix it.” Change doesn’t mean it’s broken, it only means we need to improve it.
    5. “It’s too much trouble.” The greatest rewards in life usually take the most time and energy.
    6. “It’s too expensive, and we just can’t afford it.” We can’t afford not to, or we will not have progression.
    7. “It will just change again soon.” It may change tomorrow, or it might not change for some time. Regardless, our fears of the need to keep changing should never prevent us from doing so.
    8. “I like it the way it is.” It may be good the way it is, but it could be great the new way. Besides, if we never moved away from what we like, we may never know how much better something can be!
    9. “I may not be needed after the change.” With change comes a time to grow. This may be your chance to do new and exciting things.
    10. “It’s too risky.” The greatest rewards always come from the greatest risk.

    As I jumped back into membership with NASJE I wasn’t satisfied to just dip in a toe here and there but to jump back in head first. With the gracious support of leadership, I was able to attend the 2018 NASJE Conference where I established connections with new people and became reacquainted with individuals who I had come to know during my previous membership. I joined the communications committee, so I can keep up with the pulse of information and was re-inspired to develop strong education programs with positive learning experiences. The passion I saw and felt in others, those who led sessions and those who attended just like me, renewed my excitement for judicial education. I decided that as I returned home I was ready to face this change challenge and look to a new future with our judicial education programs.

    Remember, what you do today is what impacts the type of day you will have tomorrow. Start thinking today about how you want to impact tomorrow. You cannot do it without making the necessary changes and you cannot have a future without change.

    Change is the law of life and those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.
    –John F. Kennedy

  • From the President (Fall 2018)

    For my first written communication with the members of NASJE, I wanted to address a reality I think many of us know deep within, but rarely stop and give it the consideration it deserves. I want to talk about being a judicial educator. More to the point, I want to share my thoughts on what a special profession we are a part of. In Austin I talked with the Fundamentals class about these topics. I wanted to extend my observations to a broader audience.

    Anthony Simones
    NASJE President Anthony Simones

    For over twenty years, I was a professor in the university setting. I loved it. I taught courses including Constitutional Law, Criminology and Government-subjects that mattered to me and that I found fascinating. I relished the opportunity to think creatively about important issues, to interact with and bring out the best in students and to be a part of creating a better future. My final teaching position was a small school in Georgia, where I created and ran my own program. As I said before, I loved it. But my wife wanted to return to her native Missouri. We wanted to start a family and she wanted our child to grow up surrounded by an extended family. She asked if I would be open to moving to Missouri if the right opportunity presented itself. I agreed, thinking that the possibility of something coming up in Missouri was remote at best. Not long after, my wife came to me with news of a job as Manager of Judicial Education for the Supreme Court of Missouri. I applied and was given an interview. I was then offered the position.

    Teaching was something I enjoyed and at which I excelled. I was being asked if I wanted to trade it all in on something that was a complete unknown. From a professional point of view, it made sense to stay where I was, in a position I had worked to decades to achieve. For the first time in my adult life, I made a decision based not on what I saw as best for me professionally, but as what I saw as best for other people who were depending on me. I accepted the job in Missouri. However, I took it thinking, “Well, the most interesting part of your professional life is now over.”

    As I look back on my thought process, it is astonishing how someone who is supposed to be so smart could have been so clueless.

    Even though I had never heard of “Judicial Education” before I learned of this job opportunity, I was about to about to get a crash-course about a field that I have come to regard as one of the most worthy and meaningful professions I have ever encountered.

    As a judicial educator, I have been able to interact with individuals in the courts who are simply amazing. From the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Missouri to young court clerks taking their fledgling steps in learning their new field, the attributes they display on a daily basis are remarkably similar: a desire to address problems and make a difference in the lives of others and a willingness to work tirelessly to bring about improvement of our system. As a judicial educator, I have been able to help those who work for the courts realize and understand just how essential their role is. Alexander Hamilton proclaimed that nothing has a greater impact on the people’s view of government than the daily administration of justice. Yet most people who work for the courts have no idea how essential their role is in giving life to the principles and ideals articulated by the Framers of our Constitution. As a judicial educator, I have been able to help those who work for the courts see how vital their work is.
    As a judicial educator, I have been able to impact things I used to merely talk about in the classroom. One of the messages I presented for decades was the necessity of a fair and impartial judiciary that operated, to the extent that it is possible, beyond the realm of politics. As a judicial educator, I was able to design programs that allowed judges to interact with the public and spread this message. One of the ideas that I used to stress in my classroom was the necessity for collaboration and for individuals within government to learn to interact effectively with each other. As a judicial educator, I was able to create the Missouri Court Management Institute, which brought together judges, court administrators, court clerks and juvenile officers. This venue allowed the different players in our judiciary to learn about, and from, each other, with the intention of improving the quality of justice in our state.

    I do not relate these accomplishments as a mechanism of self-aggrandizement, but rather, as a means of challenging each and every one of you to think about the ways that your work as judicial educators has made a difference in the administration of justice. This is what I have done; now, think about all you have done. We are so busy doing the important work that occupies every moment of our days that we rarely stop to think about how essential that work is in improving the lives of the people in our state. Lee Ann Barnhardt and I tried to do this at the conference with our session on a few of the outstanding programs around the nation, but we only identified the tip of the iceberg.

    I hope that everyone who reads this will stop, take a moment and think about the importance of your work. Take a minute to recall the initiatives you have been involved in designing and implementing, the effort you have put forth to make a difference and the impact you have had on justice and the quality of people’s lives.

    Which brings me to the final point I want to make about being a judicial educator. It has allowed me to become a part of NASJE and to meet some of the most brilliant, energetic, committed and caring people I have ever known. I am in awe of you. I am inspired by you. I have learned how to be an effective judicial educator from you. I have learned how to be a leader from you. I have learned how to be a better person from you.

    And that is the message I want to share in my first communication. I am honored to be a part of this extraordinary organization and humbled to serve as your president. Please let me know how I can be of assistance to you. I look very, very forward to this upcoming year.

  • Independence Corrupted: How America’s Judges Make Their Decisions

    By Charles Benjamin Schudson, Wisconsin Reserve Judge Emeritus

    Spoiler alert – here are the last words of my new book, Independence Corrupted / How America’s Judges Make Their Decisions (University of Wisconsin Press, 2018):

    Independence CorruptedJudges, so strong, so fragile; independence, so vital and threatened. “Life,” Justice Holmes wrote, “is painting a picture, not doing a sum.” I wonder about that. But judicial life? That, I know – reason and compassion … many sums, and paintings, too.

    Independence Corrupted (available at Amazon) goes behind the trial bench and even into appellate chambers to dissect judicial decision-making in actual cases I judged – for ten years, alone, as a trial judge; for twelve years, with colleagues, as an appellate judge. The cases are page-turners, fascinating courtroom conflicts involving abortion protesters, abused children, murderers, sex predators, civil rights, health insurance, the insanity defense, multi-million dollar punitive damages, and more.

    It is a “memoired treatise” intended to be equally valuable for lay readers, college and law students, and judges. It is about law, of course, but also about American constitutional history and evolving concepts of “independence” and “corruption.” And, perhaps most poignantly, it is about the dynamics of judicial decision-making. As Professor Aine Donovan, former director of the Dartmouth College Ethics Institute, wrote, it “shows the difficult and often wrenching decision-making process that every judge must endure.”

    Hopefully, it does so in a candid, respectful, sensitive, and scholarly manner that can be of significant value for America’s judges and judicial educators. Probing and exposing, it is painfully frank, and it explicitly considers judicial ethics codes and the ethical dilemma of offering such analysis.

    In three years of researching and writing, I found Independence Corrupted carrying me back to judicial education experiences – classroom encounters, as both student and teacher. I write about them and organizations including the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, the National Judicial College, the National Center for State Courts, and NASJE. I conclude one of my chapters with these words:

    During my more than thirty years of judicial service and teaching, I watched America’s judiciary change – from a dedicated but self-satisfied, lily-white group of good ol’ boys to a more diverse, enlightened, and sensitive assemblage. While some old problems persist, and while new ones emerge, America’s judges, now more than ever, constitute an enthusiastic student body, willing to question and ready to learn. Working with them has been among the most gratifying experiences of my life – a few bad apples, of course, but from Gala to Granny Smith, from Akane to Zestar, a delicious group.

    And the lengthy footnote (fair warning: one of 399 footnotes) to that paragraph concludes, “Such superb [judicial education] programs make a difference, challenging America’s judges, improving their practices, and truly transforming some of their most important understandings.”

    Writing this book, I had plenty of help – some of it from some of you. The pre-publication readers’ reactions to Independence Corrupted have been heartening; and the book has been nominated for the Chautauqua Prize, the ABA Silver Gavel Award, and the National Book Award.

    In 1829, Chief Justice John Marshall declared, “[T]he greatest scourge an angry Heaven ever inflicted upon an ungrateful and a sinning people, was an ignorant, a corrupt, or a dependent judiciary.” Obviously, he wasn’t promoting my book but his words might do so now. Am I? You betcha – left on the shelves, it does no one any good; but in your hands, and taken to heart by our judges, it may join judicial educators in helping to protect America’s judiciaries against that “greatest scourge.”

    Charles SchudsonCharles Benjamin Schudson, a Wisconsin Reserve Judge Emeritus and long-time NASJE member, served as a state and federal prosecutor, a trial and appellate judge, and as an adjunct professor of law at Marquette University and the University of Wisconsin. For many years, he served on the faculties of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges and the National Judicial College. He has taught at countless judicial colleges and conferences throughout America, and in recent years, served as a Fulbright Fellow teaching at law schools abroad. He also co-authored On Trial / America’s Courts and Their Treatment of Sexually Abused Children (Beacon Press, 1989; 2d ed., 1991).

  • Meet NASJE Member Emily Brooks

    Emily BrooksWelcome to our newest NASJE member, a Judicial Resource and Outreach Coordinator at the Wisconsin Office of Judicial Education, Emily Brooks!

    1. What was your path to judicial education?
    My path is a little interesting! I started off in K-12 Education as a 5th-Grade Teacher for two years. I then moved into College Admissions (due to layoffs in the district), where I worked as an Admissions Counselor for almost four years. A perk of working at that college was that you could receive a Master’s degree for no cost. So, I dove into Instructional Design and Technology at that time. Once I graduated, I landed an Instructional Design Consultant position at an Online campus of a two-year system. I worked there close to three years, and due to some restructuring, I began looking for training type positions to utilize both my Instructional Design, Admissions/Marketing, and Education backgrounds. I landed my current position through my more unconventional path. My twin brother actually recommended I go for it!

    2. How long have you worked at your organization?
    I have a little under a month working in my current position with the Wisconsin Supreme Court as their newly created Judicial Resource and Outreach Coordinator, and it has been incredibly creative and exciting so far.

    3. If you could do another job for just one day, what would it be?
    If I could work any job for a day I would choose something that works with monkeys. My favorite type is a golden lion tamarin.

    4. What do you like to do when you’re not at work?
    When I’m not at work, I like to watch copious amounts of Netflix and Hulu shows with my husband, snuggle with my pup, and when I’m feeling inspired, paint.

    5. What’s your favorite movie?
    My absolute favorite movie is Twister. My husband did not believe I could quote the whole thing, but I proved him wrong. 🙂

  • Christopherson Appointed Director of Judicial Branch Education

    Christine Christopherson has been named Director of Nebraska Judicial Branch Education, a position that oversees the coordination and delivery of educational offerings for all Judicial Branch employees and judges throughout the state. Read more about it at the Nebraska Supreme Court website.

  • NASJE Members Lead Session at NACM Conference

    Members of NASJE lent their experience and expertise to a cadre of court leaders from across the nation at the July meeting of the National Association of Court Management in Atlanta.

    Tony Simones & Jeff Schrade
    NASJE Facilitators
    Tony Simones & Jeff Schrade

    “NACM wanted to offer an educational session to equip our NACM state court leaders with the knowledge and skills about how adults learn and how to apply that knowledge whether teaching the NACM CORE or leading the State Association,” observed Will Simmons, President-Elect of NACM. “We reached out to NASJE to design this session with the full confidence that it would be a great partnership.”

    A four-hour session on “Leaders Teaching Leaders” was facilitated by Jeff Schrade, Education Services Division Director at the Arizona Supreme Court and Tony Simones, Director of Civic Education for The Missouri Bar. Twenty-one court managers who lead regional and state court management associations participated in the session, as well as seven experienced mentors from NACM leadership. To encourage and facilitate discussion, three participants and a mentor were placed at seven tables.

    While Schrade and Simones presented information to the entire group on subjects ranging from the courts as learning organizations to adult learning principles and creating learning objectives, an even greater amount of time was given to the participants for analysis and discussion of these ideas in small groups at their tables. “Jeff and I knew it was essential that they go beyond just listening to information and actually engage each other nto build valuable skills,” Tony Simones stated. “We wanted them to return to their courts prepared to implement these concepts.”

    NACM SeminarThe day culminated with participants making presentations about material from the NACM Core that would create a foundation for interactions they will ultimately have with their own colleagues and staff. “Court leaders must teach – whether through formal classroom instruction, mentoring, or communicating with and persuading a wide variety of team members and other justice stakeholders,” commented Jeff Schrade.

    Not only was the session designed to enhance the presentation and communication skills of regional court management association leaders, it was also intended to demonstrate to NACM leadership the viability of holding longer programs to explore topics in greater detail.

    NACM President-Elect Will Simmons characterized the event as a success: “The NASJE facilitators, Tony Simones and Jeff Schrade, were outstanding and the “Leaders Teaching Leaders” session was designed perfectly to meet our needs. The participant feedback was phenomenal. We are very excited about our partnership with NASJE.”

  • Meet NASJE Member Sarah Lee

    The NASJE Membership and Mentorship Committee is excited to welcome one of our newest members, Ms. Sarah Lee!

    Sarah has recently moved from New York City to Reno, Nevada, and is handling the culture shock with grace. She was kind enough to answer our New Member Minute questionnaire…

    1. What was your path to judicial education?
    After ten years in private practice, judicial education was an exciting and refreshing way to combine my legal background with educating some of the brightest minds shaping our judiciary.

    2. How long have you worked at your organization?
    I started at the National Judicial College at the end of May 2018.

    3. If you could do another job for just one day, what would it be?
    I would work on an olive farm in Cinque Terre, Italy.

    4. What do you like to do when you’re not at work?
    I love travelling, spending time with my family and eating delicious food.

    5. What’s your favorite movie?
    50 First Dates